header-logo header-logo

In hot water?

224735
Aneurin Brewer sets out a practical guide to defending the pilots of small boats following the Nationality and Borders Act 2022
  • This article seeks to address, from a defence practitioner’s perspective, practical approaches to the prosecution of pilots of small boats following the amendments to ss 24 and 25 of the Immigration Act 1971 made by ss 40 and 41 of the Nationality and Borders Act 2022.

As migrant crossings of the British Channel in so-called ‘small boats’ rose in political salience in and around 2018, the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) started to attempt to prosecute the pilots of these craft. These pilots are usually asylum seekers themselves who have been pressganged or induced into holding the tiller in return for reduced fares. Nevertheless, these defendants were charged and routinely convicted of offences of facilitating their passengers’ alleged breaches of immigration law, contrary to s 25 of the Immigration Act 1971 (IA 1971), an offence primarily intended for the prosecution of people smugglers.

In R v Kakaei [2021] EWCA

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Slater Heelis—Charlotte Beck

Partner and Manchester office lead appointed head of family

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

Civil Justice Council—Nigel Teasdale

DWF insurance services director appointed to Civil Justice Council

R3—Jodie Wildridge

R3—Jodie Wildridge

Kings Chambers barrister appointed chair of R3 Yorkshire

NEWS

The abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC

Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll