header-logo header-logo

In hot water?

224735
Aneurin Brewer sets out a practical guide to defending the pilots of small boats following the Nationality and Borders Act 2022
  • This article seeks to address, from a defence practitioner’s perspective, practical approaches to the prosecution of pilots of small boats following the amendments to ss 24 and 25 of the Immigration Act 1971 made by ss 40 and 41 of the Nationality and Borders Act 2022.

As migrant crossings of the British Channel in so-called ‘small boats’ rose in political salience in and around 2018, the Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) started to attempt to prosecute the pilots of these craft. These pilots are usually asylum seekers themselves who have been pressganged or induced into holding the tiller in return for reduced fares. Nevertheless, these defendants were charged and routinely convicted of offences of facilitating their passengers’ alleged breaches of immigration law, contrary to s 25 of the Immigration Act 1971 (IA 1971), an offence primarily intended for the prosecution of people smugglers.

In R v Kakaei [2021] EWCA

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll