header-logo header-logo

16 March 2023
Categories: Legal News , Profession , Legal services , Regulatory
printer mail-detail

In-house and under pressure?

One in 20 corporate counsel have come under pressure to suppress or ignore information in conflict with their regulatory obligations, according to research by the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA).

Moreover, one in ten have found their regulatory obligations compromised while trying to meet their employer’s priorities, particularly when faced with heavy workloads, the In-house solicitors thematic review found. Some senior in-house counsel acknowledged that balancing regulatory responsibilities while maintaining effective working relationships can be challenging.

However, most of the more than 1,200 in-house lawyers responding to the survey felt their independence was valued in their organisation, and most said they would feel comfortable advising their employer against unethical action. The majority were confident they could act ethically even if under pressure from their employer.

The SRA concluded some in-house teams need to have formal policies and controls in place to guard against such pressure. It committed to publishing new guidance for the in-house sector, launching dedicated online resources and running events to share best practice and get further feedback on areas where more support is needed.

Paul Philip, SRA chief executive, said: ‘The in-house sector continues to grow, with 8,000 more in-house solicitors than a decade ago.

‘They now make up around a fifth of practising solicitors. The findings of this review are generally encouraging. Yet a minority struggle.

‘We heard frequently that heavy workloads were a significant challenge. That is a problem if it means some in-house solicitors struggle to commit appropriate time to training or careful consideration of key decisions.’

Philip said the review also found one in ten in-house lawyers do not have enough time to keep their skills and knowledge up to date.

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll