header-logo header-logo

01 July 2021
Issue: 7939 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

In-house workload on the rise

Nearly two-thirds (64%) of chief counsel and heads of legal departments predict workloads to increase by up to 30% as they grapple with a range of challenges

However, three-quarters of counsel also expect no growth in headcount in the next 12-18 months to cover the extra work, and more than 40% also plan to reduce spend by up to a third.

Consequently, heads of legal departments are realigning their operating models and focusing on technology, and data to drive value for their business. However, budgets for technology investment remain limited therefore teams are looking within at what technology they already have and how they might leverage it rather than purchasing more tech.

The information was gathered by Ashurst, in association with legal consultants OMC Partners, for a report published this week, ‘Legal operations―the shape of things to come’. It compiles the views of 50 in-house counsel leaders with an aggregated legal spend of about £4bn on the range of approaches they intend to implement in the next 12-18 months as they emerge from the COVID-19 pandemic.

The research found legal departments are using existing technology to drive decision making. It also found a change in attitude towards office space with three-quarters of respondents planning to re-evaluate their teams’ real estate needs. Of those, 70% intend to remodel and optimise office space while 50% want to streamline their office footprints.

About 30% of respondents are considering adding legal operations managers roles to their team, highlighting how they want to focus on legal tech and spend management capabilities.

Helga Butcher, Ashurst's head of legal project management and legal process improvement, said: ‘There is no “one size fits all” when it comes to transforming legal operating models.

Our research has shown that law department leaders are developing a blend of cost reduction, efficiency and productivity approaches to their transformation programmes.’

 

Issue: 7939 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Freeths—Rachel Crosier

Projects and rail practices strengthened by director hire in London

DWF—Stephen Hickling

DWF—Stephen Hickling

Real estate team in Birmingham welcomes back returning partner

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Ward Hadaway—44 appointments

Firm invests in national growth with 44 appointments across five offices

NEWS
Criminal juries may be convicting—or acquitting—on a misunderstanding. Writing in NLJ this week Paul McKeown, Adrian Keane and Sally Stares of The City Law School and LSE report troubling survey findings on the meaning of ‘sure’
The Serious Fraud Office (SFO) has narrowly preserved a key weapon in its anti-corruption arsenal. In this week's NLJ, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers examines Guralp Systems Ltd v SFO, in which the High Court ruled that a deferred prosecution agreement (DPA) remained in force despite the company’s failure to disgorge £2m by the stated deadline
As the drip-feed of Epstein disclosures fuels ‘collateral damage’, the rush to cry misconduct in public office may be premature. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke of Hill Dickinson warns that the offence is no catch-all for political embarrassment. It demands a ‘grave departure’ from proper standards, an ‘abuse of the public’s trust’ and conduct ‘sufficiently serious to warrant criminal punishment’
Employment law is shifting at the margins. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ this week, Ian Smith of Norwich Law School examines a Court of Appeal ruling confirming that volunteers are not a special legal species and may qualify as ‘workers’
Refusing ADR is risky—but not always fatal. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed and Sanjay Dave Singh of the University of Leicester analyse Assensus Ltd v Wirsol Energy Ltd: despite repeated invitations to mediate, the defendant stood firm, made a £100,000 Part 36 offer and was ultimately ‘wholly vindicated’ at trial
back-to-top-scroll