header-logo header-logo

In-house workload on the rise

01 July 2021
Issue: 7939 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail
Nearly two-thirds (64%) of chief counsel and heads of legal departments predict workloads to increase by up to 30% as they grapple with a range of challenges

However, three-quarters of counsel also expect no growth in headcount in the next 12-18 months to cover the extra work, and more than 40% also plan to reduce spend by up to a third.

Consequently, heads of legal departments are realigning their operating models and focusing on technology, and data to drive value for their business. However, budgets for technology investment remain limited therefore teams are looking within at what technology they already have and how they might leverage it rather than purchasing more tech.

The information was gathered by Ashurst, in association with legal consultants OMC Partners, for a report published this week, ‘Legal operations―the shape of things to come’. It compiles the views of 50 in-house counsel leaders with an aggregated legal spend of about £4bn on the range of approaches they intend to implement in the next 12-18 months as they emerge from the COVID-19 pandemic.

The research found legal departments are using existing technology to drive decision making. It also found a change in attitude towards office space with three-quarters of respondents planning to re-evaluate their teams’ real estate needs. Of those, 70% intend to remodel and optimise office space while 50% want to streamline their office footprints.

About 30% of respondents are considering adding legal operations managers roles to their team, highlighting how they want to focus on legal tech and spend management capabilities.

Helga Butcher, Ashurst's head of legal project management and legal process improvement, said: ‘There is no “one size fits all” when it comes to transforming legal operating models.

Our research has shown that law department leaders are developing a blend of cost reduction, efficiency and productivity approaches to their transformation programmes.’

 

Issue: 7939 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll