header-logo header-logo

01 July 2021
Issue: 7939 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-detail

In-house workload on the rise

Nearly two-thirds (64%) of chief counsel and heads of legal departments predict workloads to increase by up to 30% as they grapple with a range of challenges

However, three-quarters of counsel also expect no growth in headcount in the next 12-18 months to cover the extra work, and more than 40% also plan to reduce spend by up to a third.

Consequently, heads of legal departments are realigning their operating models and focusing on technology, and data to drive value for their business. However, budgets for technology investment remain limited therefore teams are looking within at what technology they already have and how they might leverage it rather than purchasing more tech.

The information was gathered by Ashurst, in association with legal consultants OMC Partners, for a report published this week, ‘Legal operations―the shape of things to come’. It compiles the views of 50 in-house counsel leaders with an aggregated legal spend of about £4bn on the range of approaches they intend to implement in the next 12-18 months as they emerge from the COVID-19 pandemic.

The research found legal departments are using existing technology to drive decision making. It also found a change in attitude towards office space with three-quarters of respondents planning to re-evaluate their teams’ real estate needs. Of those, 70% intend to remodel and optimise office space while 50% want to streamline their office footprints.

About 30% of respondents are considering adding legal operations managers roles to their team, highlighting how they want to focus on legal tech and spend management capabilities.

Helga Butcher, Ashurst's head of legal project management and legal process improvement, said: ‘There is no “one size fits all” when it comes to transforming legal operating models.

Our research has shown that law department leaders are developing a blend of cost reduction, efficiency and productivity approaches to their transformation programmes.’

 

Issue: 7939 / Categories: Legal News , Profession
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
Recent allegations surrounding Peter Mandelson and Andrew Mountbatten-Windsor have reignited scrutiny of the ancient common law offence of misconduct in public office. Writing in NLJ this week, Simon Parsons, teaching fellow at Bath Spa University, asks whether their conduct could clear a notoriously high legal hurdle
A landmark ruling has reshaped child clinical negligence claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Jodi Newton, head of birth and paediatric negligence at Osbornes Law, explains how the Supreme Court in CCC v Sheffield Teaching Hospitals NHS Foundation Trust [2026] UKSC 5 has overturned Croke v Wiseman, ending the long-standing bar on children recovering ‘lost years’ earnings
A Court of Appeal ruling has drawn a firm line under party autonomy in arbitration. Writing in NLJ this week, Masood Ahmed, associate professor at the University of Leicester, analyses Gluck v Endzweig [2026] EWCA Civ 145, where a clause allowing arbitrators to amend an award ‘at any time’ was held incompatible with the Arbitration Act 1996
back-to-top-scroll