Indefinite or perpetual?

Galaxy SOHO, an urban complex in Beijing designed by Zaha Hadid

Rory Spillman & Simon Fitzpatrick investigate a contractual puzzle surrounding the late Zaha Hadid’s architectural legacy

Examines the Court of Appeal judgment in Zaha Hadid Ltd v The Zaha Hadid Foundation, concerning a contract between two organisations set up by renowned architect Dame Zaha Hadid.
Despite the absence of an express term, a right to terminate on reasonable notice may be ‘inferred’ within a contract of indefinite duration using the well-established principles of contractual construction, rather than resorting to implication of terms.
The Court of Appeal distinguished between ‘indefinite’ and ‘perpetual’ contracts.

The case of Zaha Hadid Ltd v The Zaha Hadid Foundation [2026] EWCA Civ 192 involved a trademark licence originally given by Dame Zaha Hadid to her architecture firm, Zaha Hadid Ltd (the company). Upon her death in 2016, the trademark was bequeathed to the Zaha Hadid Foundation (the foundation) which became party to the licence agreement. In wishing to renegotiate the terms of the licence agreement, the company contended that despite there

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

Indefinite or perpetual?

Issue: 8171 / Categories: Features , Copyright , Contract , Commercial

Galaxy SOHO, an urban complex in Beijing designed by Zaha Hadid

Rory Spillman & Simon Fitzpatrick investigate a contractual puzzle surrounding the late Zaha Hadid’s architectural legacy

Examines the Court of Appeal judgment in Zaha Hadid Ltd v The Zaha Hadid Foundation, concerning a contract between two organisations set up by renowned architect Dame Zaha Hadid.
Despite the absence of an express term, a right to terminate on reasonable notice may be ‘inferred’ within a contract of indefinite duration using the well-established principles of contractual construction, rather than resorting to implication of terms.
The Court of Appeal distinguished between ‘indefinite’ and ‘perpetual’ contracts.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content

If you are already a subscriber sign in

...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

SourceURL:

Links:

E-newsletter Sign-Up

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All

NLJ Career Profile: Maryam Syed KC, Church Court Chambers

From childhood dreams of the Bar to some of the country's most challenging cases, Maryam Syed KC explains why she has never stopped standing up for others

DAC Beachcroft—Richard Breavington, Rachel Ford & Daniel Guilfoyle

DAC Beachcroft significantly expands Cyber team, hiring three Cyber partners

Browne Jacobson—Professor Clive Kay

Browne Jacobson appoints senior healthcare leader Professor Clive Kay as strategic adviser

NEWS

Read All

Dr Karl Mackie: mediator, teacher, writer & pioneer

CEDR has announced the death of its Founder President and first Chief Executive, Dr Karl Mackie CBE

Merricks approaches payout day

Consumers will receive their Merricks v Mastercard compensation in the first half of next year, class representative and former Financial Ombudsman Walter Merricks has said

Solicitor had no right to bill

A law firm was not entitled to payment for jointly administering an estate as there was no charging clause in the will, the High Court Senior Courts Costs Office has ruled

Mercedes ‘Dieselgate’ trial given green light

The so-called ‘Dieselgate’ quantum trial will go ahead against Mercedes, after the High Court rejected an attempt by car owners to delay the proceedings

MoD loses argument on costs

The Ministry of Defence (MoD) must pay the bulk of the legal costs in the military deafness litigation, the High Court has held

Error message

Indefinite or perpetual?

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Maryam Syed KC, Church Court Chambers

DAC Beachcroft—Richard Breavington, Rachel Ford & Daniel Guilfoyle

Browne Jacobson—Professor Clive Kay