header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
01 July 2018 / Dapinder Singh KC
Issue: 7802 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

Indian legal market liberalisation: one step forward, one step back

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
856615090

With the Indian Supreme Court reserving judgment on the liberalisation of the Indian legal sector, Dapinder Singh QC examines the latest developments in this potentially huge market
  • The UK legal sector awaits a hugely significant decision on the potential liberalisation of the Indian market.
  • If liberalisation is allowed, major UK firms are well placed to push further into the market.
  • Can liberalisation be the catalyst for Indian firms’ growth and influence abroad?

It was in mid-March that the Supreme Court of India ruled on whether to open up the Indian legal market to overseas firms. It decided not to decide. At least not fully. So we have another pause in the decades-long to-ing and fro-ing on the matter.

The current status sees a small concession in that foreign lawyers may now formally visit India on a ‘fly in/fly out’ basis and may offer clients advice on foreign laws. However, it remains that foreign firms cannot set up Indian offices without changes to the Indian

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Switalskis—Naila Arif, Harriet Findlay & Ellie Thompson

Switalskis—Naila Arif, Harriet Findlay & Ellie Thompson

Firm awards training contracts to paralegals through internal programme

Ward Hadaway—Matthew Morton

Ward Hadaway—Matthew Morton

Private client disputes specialist joins commercial litigation team

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Nina Hood

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Nina Hood

Cumbria firm appoints new head of residential property

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
NLJ this week: Family law urged to ditch adversarial instincts
Family law must shift from conflict-driven litigation to child-centred problem-solving, according to a major new report. Writing in NLJ this week, Caroline Bowden of Anthony Gold outlines findings showing overwhelming support for reform, with 92% agreeing lawyers owe duties to children as well as clients
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll