header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
02 May 2014
Issue: 7604 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Injunction—Breach of contract—Personal performance

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.

Ashworth and others v Royal National Theatre [2014] EWHC 1176 (QB), [2014] All ER (D) 171 (Apr)

Queen’s Bench Division, Cranston J, 15 Apr 2014

The musicians formerly employed by the National Theatre to play in the production of War Horse were not entitled to an injunction requiring them to be returned to the play pending resolution of their action for unfair dismissal, even though they had a serious case to be tried 
on their contractual claim. 

James Laddie QC & Claire Darwin (instructed by Slater & Gordon (UK) LLP) for the claimants. David Reade QC & Jeremy Lewis (instructed by Harbottle & Lewis LLP) for the defendant.

The claimants were all professional musicians. They had been employed by the defendant, the National Theatre, to perform in the well-known play War Horse. The play involved some recorded and some live music. Production in other countries had involved only recorded music, and after a time the defendant decided only to use recorded music for the London production. In March

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Carey Olsen—Patrick Ormond

Partner joinscorporate and finance practice in British Virgin Islands

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Dawson Cornwell—Naomi Angell

Firm strengthens children department with adoption and surrogacy expert

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Penningtons Manches Cooper—Graham Green

Media and technology expert joins employment team as partner in Cambridge

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
LexisNexis Legal Awards 2026—the winners!
The winners of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2026 have now been announced, marking another outstanding celebration of excellence, innovation, and impact across the legal profession
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll