header-logo header-logo

Injunction—Breach of contract—Personal performance

02 May 2014
Issue: 7604 / Categories: Case law , Law reports , In Court
printer mail-detail

Ashworth and others v Royal National Theatre [2014] EWHC 1176 (QB), [2014] All ER (D) 171 (Apr)

Queen’s Bench Division, Cranston J, 15 Apr 2014

The musicians formerly employed by the National Theatre to play in the production of War Horse were not entitled to an injunction requiring them to be returned to the play pending resolution of their action for unfair dismissal, even though they had a serious case to be tried 
on their contractual claim. 

James Laddie QC & Claire Darwin (instructed by Slater & Gordon (UK) LLP) for the claimants. David Reade QC & Jeremy Lewis (instructed by Harbottle & Lewis LLP) for the defendant.

The claimants were all professional musicians. They had been employed by the defendant, the National Theatre, to perform in the well-known play War Horse. The play involved some recorded and some live music. Production in other countries had involved only recorded music, and after a time the defendant decided only to use recorded music for the London production. In March

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll