header-logo header-logo

The injury damages divide

11 February 2016
Issue: 7686 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The discrepancy between legal remedies for physical injury and those for injury to feelings is unacceptable, according to a senior personal injury solicitor.

Writing in NLJ this week, Diane Parker, head of personal injury at Atherton Godfrey says: “There is a large discrepancy that already exists between the levels of damages awarded for ‘bodily injury’ and those awarded for ‘name calling’.”

This reflects a class divide, Parker says, since defamation claimants are typically rich celebrities, politicians or sports stars. A labourer, on the other hand, may not have such a highly valued public reputation to defend but a physical injury could ruin their livelihood.

The government’s proposed ban on whiplash claims will only increase this divide, says Parker. “In the interests of saving motorists £50 a year on their insurance policies, thousands of injured people will be denied the derisory levels of compensation they could expect to be awarded and will lose any realistic prospect of recovering the earnings they lose while physically unable to work.”

Issue: 7686 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details
RELATED ARTICLES

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
In NLJ this week, Bea Rossetto of the National Pro Bono Centre marks Pro Bono Week by urging lawyers to recognise the emotional toll of pro bono work
Can a lease legally last only days—or even hours? Professor Mark Pawlowski of the University of Greenwich explores the question in this week's NLJ
RFC Seraing v FIFA, in which the Court of Justice of the EU (CJEU) reaffirmed that awards by the Court of Arbitration for Sport (CAS) may be reviewed by EU courts on public-policy grounds, is under examination in this week's NLJ by Dr Estelle Ivanova of Valloni Attorneys at Law, Zurich
back-to-top-scroll