header-logo header-logo

11 February 2016 / Diane Parker
Issue: 7686 / Categories: Opinion , Personal injury
printer mail-detail

Missing out?

nlj_7686_parker

The discrepancy between personal injury & defamation damages is unacceptable, says Diane Parker

“Sticks and stones may break my bones, but words will never hurt me.”

It would be surprising to meet anyone growing up in Britain who had not used or at least heard this phrase in their school playgrounds, at some point in their childhood.

And of course, it isn’t true. The human body heals from physical trauma quickly and physical pain is often quickly forgotten (a mechanism I’m sure exists to ensure that women have more than one child). On the other hand, a lot of us will have unhappy memories of school bully taunts and name calling that may have affected our psyches for years.

Until now, English law has recognised that both physical trauma and damage to reputation can cause harm and has created mechanisms to ensure the injured party, who can never recover what has been lost, can at least recover financial recompense for the injury sustained.

Class divide?

However, there is a large discrepancy that already exists between the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
From cat fouling to Part 36 brinkmanship, the latest 'Civil way' round-up is a reminder that procedural skirmishes can have sharp teeth. NLJ columnist Stephen Gold ranges across recent decisions with his customary wit
Digital loot may feel like property, but civil law is not always convinced. In NLJ this week, Paul Schwartfeger of 36 Stone and Nadia Latti of CMS examine fraud involving platform-controlled digital assets, from ‘account takeover and asset stripping’ to ‘value laundering’
Lasting powers of attorney (LPAs) are not ‘set and forget’ documents. In this week's NLJ, Ann Stanyer of Wedlake Bell urges practitioners to review LPAs every five years and after major life changes
back-to-top-scroll