header-logo header-logo

26 June 2008 / George Sim
Issue: 7327 / Categories: Opinion , Legal services , Procedure & practice , Profession
printer mail-detail

An insider's view

Fraudulent trading: a forensic accountant's perspective by George Sim

The “credit crunch” and the expected downturn in the economy are likely to put pressure on many businesses' finances and may lead to the discovery of instances of fraudulent trading.

By way of example, on 16 May 2008, Peter Bradley was sentenced to four years' imprisonment at Liverpool Crown Court and was disqualified from acting as a company director for 10 years, having pleaded guilty to one count of fraudulent trading. His company, Alta Gas, a bottled gas business with seven filling plants and 30 depots nationwide, collapsed in 2001; during the receivership it was discovered that fictitious sales had been created and that the profitability of the company had been misrepresented to providers of finance.

Fraudulent trading occurs when a business continues to trade at a time when there is, to the knowledge of the business's management, no reasonable prospect of creditors ever receiving payment. This includes a situation such as Alta Gas in which there are no good grounds for thinking that the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll