header-logo header-logo

13 June 2013
Issue: 7564 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Insolvency

Re GP Aviation Group International (in liquidation) Ltd Williams v Glover and another [2013] EWHC 1447 (Ch), [2013] All ER (D) 41 (Jun)

The question arose in proceedings between the liquidators and former directors of a company as to whether the right to appeal against a tax liability constituted the ‘property’ of the company. Consideration was given to s 436 of the Insolvency Act 1986. The court ruled, first, that the classical definition of a chose in action was that it described “all personal rights of property which could only be claimed or enforced by action and not by taking physical possession.” A bare right to appeal against what would otherwise be a liability did not satisfy that definition. Secondly, the authorities maintained a distinction between a chose and the remedies available for its enforcement. The right to a remedy was an incident of the ownership of the chose. It was not something that was capable of being sold or assigned separately from the right to which it related. The right of appeal was a right conferred on

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll