header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 163, Issue 7564

14 June 2013
IN THIS ISSUE

David Greene takes issue with excessive & ineffective political grandstanding

Nicholas Dobson considers the lessons we can learn from Sally Bercow’s mishap

Sejal Raja provides an update on post-employment victimisation protection

The High Court has provided guidance on the correct approach to assessing an occupier’s duty of care relating to foreseeable risk. Henry Morton Jack reports

Holland Park provides a lesson in restrictive covenants, says Andrew Francis

Early determination should be considered, but only if conditions are right, says Tom Henderson

Claim early for sacking, overriding objective strikes, well done Phipson & financial remedy abuse

Animal Defenders International v United Kingdom (App. No. 48876/08) [2013] ECHR 48876/08, [2013] All ER (D) 21 (May)

R (on the application of NR) v Local Government Ombudsman [2013] EWHC 1335 (Admin), [2013] All ER (D) 18 (Jun)

Vallee v Birchwood [2013] EWHC 1449 (Ch), [2013] All ER (D) 46 (Jun)

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll