header-logo header-logo

Cause & effect

13 June 2013 / David Greene
Issue: 7564 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail
169231117

David Greene takes issue with excessive & ineffective political grandstanding

Lawyers are not the most popular band of professionals. Certainly from a politician’s point of view, much easier to blame greedy lawyers for the ills of society than portray them as the upholders of the rule of law, human rights and the justice process. 

The issues in relation to legal aid betray the easy criticism that lawyers are simply looking to line their pockets at public expense. This is of course far from the truth with legal aid practitioners working at rates and returns which place substantial economic burden on them to maintain practice. 

For lawyers it is not an easy sell. The fact is that if rights are to be effective then it has to be in the economic interests of someone to pursue them. If it makes no economic sense for a lawyer to represent clients, they will not do so. There are many examples in recent years in which legislation is invoked without consideration of how it is actually going to

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Michael Zander KC, emeritus professor at LSE, revisits his long-forgotten Crown Court Study (1993), which surveyed 22,000 participants across 3,000 cases, in the first of a two-part series for NLJ
Getty Images v Stability AI Ltd [2025] EWHC 2863 (Ch) was a landmark test of how UK law applies to AI training—but does it leave key questions unanswered, asks Emma Kennaugh-Gallagher of Mewburn Ellis in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll