header-logo header-logo

Home Login E-newsletter About us
13 June 2013 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 7564 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

Tweet if you want to, but tweet softly

© Copyright LexisNexis 2026. All Rights Reserved.
0fc_nlj_7564_coverimage

Nicholas Dobson considers the lessons we can learn from Sally Bercow’s mishap

As Irish poet W B Yeats never said, ‘Tweet softly for you tread on my reputation”. This, however, may be prudent advice after Sally Bercow’s controversial tweet which achieved an unwelcome High Court audience with Tugenhadt J.

For (in the wake of intense media speculation about the identity of “a leading Conservative politician from the Thatcher years”, following a 2 November 2012 BBC Newsnight Report which broadcast an allegation by a complainant that he had been abused by such a person when he was a boy living at the Bryn Estyn care home in Wales in the 1970s and 1980s), on 4 November 2012 Ms Bercow (wife of the House of Commons’ speaker) fired off a Tweet reading: “Why is Lord McAlpine trending? *Innocent face*”. In the High Court’s view, this was defamatory (see Lord McAlpine of West Green v Sally Bercow [2013] EWHC 1342 (QB)).

Of defamation, trending & innocent faces

As Tugenhadt J indicated,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Read All
Sponsored by
London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

London Solicitors Litigation Association—John McElroy

Fieldfisher partner appointed president as LSLA marks milestone year

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Kingsley Napley—Kirsty Churm & Olivia Stiles

Firm promotes two lawyers to partnership across employment and family

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Foot Anstey—five promotions

Firm promotes five lawyers to partnership across key growth areas

NEWS
Read All
NLJ this week: Divorce ‘nuclear weapon’ freezes assets but entangles outsiders
Freezing orders in divorce proceedings can unexpectedly ensnare third parties and disrupt businesses. In NLJ this week, Lucy James of Trowers & Hamlins explains how these orders—dubbed a ‘nuclear weapon’—preserve assets but can extend far beyond spouses to companies and business partners 
NLJ this week: What counts as ‘rent’? Court says labour alone won’t do
A Court of Appeal ruling has clarified that ‘rent’ must be monetary—excluding tenants paid in labour from statutory protection. In this week's NLJ, James Naylor explains Garraway v Phillips, where a tenant worked two days a week instead of paying rent
Your magistrates’ court needs you!
Thousands more magistrates are to be recruited, under a major shake-up to speed up and expand the hiring process
NLJ this week: Freed but failed—justice system leaves the innocent empty-handed
Three men wrongly imprisoned for a combined 77 years have been released—yet received ‘not a penny’ in compensation, exposing deep flaws in the justice system. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Jon Robins reports on Justin Plummer, Oliver Campbell and Peter Sullivan, whose convictions collapsed amid discredited forensics, ‘oppressive’ police interviews and unreliable ‘cell confessions’
NLJ this week: Clarity on whistleblowing, settlements and tribunal limits
A quiet month for employment cases still delivers key legal clarifications. In his latest Employment Law Brief for NLJ, Ian Smith reports that whistleblowing protection remains intact even where disclosures are partly self-serving, provided the worker reasonably believes they serve the ‘public interest’ 
Copyright © 2026 LexisNexis
back-to-top-scroll