header-logo header-logo

13 June 2013 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 7564 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

Tweet if you want to, but tweet softly

0fc_nlj_7564_coverimage

Nicholas Dobson considers the lessons we can learn from Sally Bercow’s mishap

As Irish poet W B Yeats never said, ‘Tweet softly for you tread on my reputation”. This, however, may be prudent advice after Sally Bercow’s controversial tweet which achieved an unwelcome High Court audience with Tugenhadt J.

For (in the wake of intense media speculation about the identity of “a leading Conservative politician from the Thatcher years”, following a 2 November 2012 BBC Newsnight Report which broadcast an allegation by a complainant that he had been abused by such a person when he was a boy living at the Bryn Estyn care home in Wales in the 1970s and 1980s), on 4 November 2012 Ms Bercow (wife of the House of Commons’ speaker) fired off a Tweet reading: “Why is Lord McAlpine trending? *Innocent face*”. In the High Court’s view, this was defamatory (see Lord McAlpine of West Green v Sally Bercow [2013] EWHC 1342 (QB)).

Of defamation, trending & innocent faces

As Tugenhadt J indicated,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll