header-logo header-logo

13 June 2013 / Nicholas Dobson
Issue: 7564 / Categories: Opinion
printer mail-detail

Tweet if you want to, but tweet softly

0fc_nlj_7564_coverimage

Nicholas Dobson considers the lessons we can learn from Sally Bercow’s mishap

As Irish poet W B Yeats never said, ‘Tweet softly for you tread on my reputation”. This, however, may be prudent advice after Sally Bercow’s controversial tweet which achieved an unwelcome High Court audience with Tugenhadt J.

For (in the wake of intense media speculation about the identity of “a leading Conservative politician from the Thatcher years”, following a 2 November 2012 BBC Newsnight Report which broadcast an allegation by a complainant that he had been abused by such a person when he was a boy living at the Bryn Estyn care home in Wales in the 1970s and 1980s), on 4 November 2012 Ms Bercow (wife of the House of Commons’ speaker) fired off a Tweet reading: “Why is Lord McAlpine trending? *Innocent face*”. In the High Court’s view, this was defamatory (see Lord McAlpine of West Green v Sally Bercow [2013] EWHC 1342 (QB)).

Of defamation, trending & innocent faces

As Tugenhadt J indicated,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bellevue Law—Sara Mason

Bellevue Law—Sara Mason

Bellevue Law expands workplace law offering with specialist healthcare regulatory appointment

Seddons GSC—Peter Ames

Seddons GSC—Peter Ames

Seddons GSC strengthens Dispute Resolution team with partner hire

Taylor Rose—four promotions

Taylor Rose—four promotions

Taylor Rose announces partner promotions

NEWS
Group claims, disputed costs and judicial recruitment dominate the latest courtroom round-up
Landlords face fresh registration duties as procedural reforms reshape the civil courts
Sanctions can derail commercial disputes long before judgment, making early planning essential
Pressure is mounting for a dedicated UK AI law, but deciding what it should achieve remains the central challenge
Legal professional privilege has checked the SRA’s investigative powers, exposing difficult questions about tackling suspected abusive litigation
back-to-top-scroll