header-logo header-logo

01 August 2013
Issue: 7571 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Insolvency

Re Icopal AS and others [2013] All ER (D) 295 (Jul)

It was settled law that the fact that English law was the governing law for all creditor arrangements provided a sufficient connection to the jurisdiction to warrant the exercise by the English court of its jurisdiction under the Companies Act 2006. The court’s function in respect of convening a scheme meeting was to determine: (i) whether the court had jurisdiction to grant the order convening the meeting; and (ii) to consider the issue in respect of composition of class. It was settled law that such a hearing was not to consider the merits and fairness of the scheme. The court had to consider whether the company was liable to be wound up pursuant to the Insolvency Act 1986.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson—Vicky Tomlinson

Browne Jacobson appoints Vicky Tomlinson as Head of Independent Health and Care

DWF—five appointments

DWF—five appointments

DWF further strengthens major injury and casualty offering with new partner and four directors from DAC Beachcroft

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis—Laura Ornsby

Switalskis strengthens Grimsby child care team

NEWS
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
Arbitration may be private, but its confidentiality is no impenetrable shield. Writing in NLJ this week, James Glaysher of Kingsley Napley examines when courts will permit arbitral material to surface in open litigation
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

back-to-top-scroll