header-logo header-logo

06 June 2014
Issue: 7609 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Insolvency

Revenue and Customs Commissioners v Winnington Networks Ltd and another company [2014] EWHC 1259 (Ch), [2014] All ER (D) 207 (May)

The principles upon which to proceed in dealing with without notice applications for the appointment of provisional liquidators were, first, the appointment of a provisional liquidator was a most serious step and should be the subject of most anxious consideration. Second, the application was without notice and needed to be justified by exceptional circumstances. A judge should not entertain an application of which no notice had been given, unless either giving notice would enable the defendant to take steps to defeat the purpose of the remedy or there had been, literally, no time to give notice. Third, it was not a trial of the petition itself and, accordingly, it was proceeded upon a provisional and interim basis. Fourth, it was for the petitioner to show that it was likely to obtain a winding-up order on the hearing of the petition. That involved demonstrating that the petitioner was entitled to present the petition and that a material part

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll