header-logo header-logo

06 June 2014
Issue: 7609 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Insolvency

Revenue and Customs Commissioners v Winnington Networks Ltd and another company [2014] EWHC 1259 (Ch), [2014] All ER (D) 207 (May)

The principles upon which to proceed in dealing with without notice applications for the appointment of provisional liquidators were, first, the appointment of a provisional liquidator was a most serious step and should be the subject of most anxious consideration. Second, the application was without notice and needed to be justified by exceptional circumstances. A judge should not entertain an application of which no notice had been given, unless either giving notice would enable the defendant to take steps to defeat the purpose of the remedy or there had been, literally, no time to give notice. Third, it was not a trial of the petition itself and, accordingly, it was proceeded upon a provisional and interim basis. Fourth, it was for the petitioner to show that it was likely to obtain a winding-up order on the hearing of the petition. That involved demonstrating that the petitioner was entitled to present the petition and that a material part

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll