header-logo header-logo

Insolvency

20 April 2007
Issue: 7269 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Hickling v Baker [2007] EWCA Civ 287, [2007] All ER (D) 51 (Apr)

The Court considered s 364 of the Insolvency Act 1986 (power of arrest), holding:

(i) arrest under an order made under s 364 can be justified under Art 5(1)(b) of the Convention;

(ii) Art 5 does not require that notice of an application for such an order be given to the person to be arrested in all cases;

(iii) if the application is made without notice, the evidence in support of the application must make it clear why this is said to be justified as an exception to the normal rule;

(iv) if the order is made on an application without notice, it is necessary that the order should provide that the person be brought before the court at an early opportunity after his arrest;

(v) the order does not have to specify any particular obligation whose fulfilment is intended to be secured; (vi) it is doubtful whether the withholding of evidence could ever be justified on an application under s 364.

 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll