header-logo header-logo

20 April 2007
Issue: 7269 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Insolvency

Hickling v Baker [2007] EWCA Civ 287, [2007] All ER (D) 51 (Apr)

The Court considered s 364 of the Insolvency Act 1986 (power of arrest), holding:

(i) arrest under an order made under s 364 can be justified under Art 5(1)(b) of the Convention;

(ii) Art 5 does not require that notice of an application for such an order be given to the person to be arrested in all cases;

(iii) if the application is made without notice, the evidence in support of the application must make it clear why this is said to be justified as an exception to the normal rule;

(iv) if the order is made on an application without notice, it is necessary that the order should provide that the person be brought before the court at an early opportunity after his arrest;

(v) the order does not have to specify any particular obligation whose fulfilment is intended to be secured; (vi) it is doubtful whether the withholding of evidence could ever be justified on an application under s 364.

 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll