header-logo header-logo

28 May 2015
Issue: 7654 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Insolvency practitioners to the rescue

Insolvency practitioners rescue businesses as well as wind them up, research has shown.

Approximately two out of every five insolvent businesses were supported to continue trading by insolvency professionals in 2013-14, according to insolvency trade body R3 and ComRes.

R3 members helped about 6,700 businesses, or more than 40% of formal insolvencies, to continue trading and rescued about 230,000 jobs.

Phillip Sykes, President of R3, says: “There is much more to insolvency than business or personal finance failure.

“As the economy continues to recover from recession, business recovery and renewal will be an important part of the economic landscape. Insolvency practitioners witness first-hand the human cost of business failure and will make every effort to protect jobs where possible.”

Issue: 7654 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Boodle Hatfield—Tom McLaughlin

Boodle Hatfield—Tom McLaughlin

Boodle Hatfield welcomes new employment partner, Tom McLaughlin

Arc Pensions Law—Victoria Thompson-Hill, Jonathan Mason & Georgi Ivanov

Arc Pensions Law—Victoria Thompson-Hill, Jonathan Mason & Georgi Ivanov

National specialist pensions law firm strengthens team with three new appointments

Jurit—Christian Abletshauser

Jurit—Christian Abletshauser

Jurit appoints Christian Abletshauser to lead family law practice

NEWS
Burges Salmon appoints Benn Richards to strengthen Contentious Insolvency offering
A High Court decision has clarified that a home may be unfit for human habitation not only where conditions endanger health or safety, but also where they seriously undermine comfort and convenience

A longer time limit for employment tribunal claims, new charity law thresholds, property tribunal recruitment and appellate guidance on small-claims costs feature in the latest Civil Way round-up

A recent High Court ruling could make issue estoppel considerably more complex in cross-border litigation, requiring parties to consider the foreign law governing the underlying claim
The Supreme Court has overturned Cheshire West’s bright-line test for deprivation of liberty, replacing it with a broader, more contextual assessment that gives greater weight to an individual’s wishes, feelings and apparent consent
back-to-top-scroll