header-logo header-logo

Institutional human rights abuse?

25 July 2013 / Jacqueline Laing
Issue: 7570 / Categories: Opinion , Human rights
printer mail-detail
istock_000009197147medium

Jacqueline Laing & Phil Charlesworth discuss the implications of the Neuberger Review of the Liverpool Care Pathway

The publication of the government-commissioned independent review of the Liverpool Care Pathway (15 July 2013) raises grave concerns about the treatment of patients in hospitals, hospices and care homes in the UK. The report confirms what critics of the Pathway, both professionals and family members, have been claiming for years. Indeed it was Freedom of Information Act 2000 requests performed by enterprising journalists that revealed the staggering increase in numbers of patients dying on the Pathway after the 2008 National Strategy incentivised the Pathway to the tune of millions of pounds.

Culture of death?

One hundred and thirty thousand patients a year are dying on the Pathway. Many hospital trusts were paid financial incentives for achieving Pathway uptake targets of two thirds of patient deaths. The report highlighted the grief of families introduced to this culture of death and the lack of compassion of medical professionals using the Pathway, often at a time when family members

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll