header-logo header-logo

25 July 2013 / Jacqueline Laing
Issue: 7570 / Categories: Opinion , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Institutional human rights abuse?

istock_000009197147medium

Jacqueline Laing & Phil Charlesworth discuss the implications of the Neuberger Review of the Liverpool Care Pathway

The publication of the government-commissioned independent review of the Liverpool Care Pathway (15 July 2013) raises grave concerns about the treatment of patients in hospitals, hospices and care homes in the UK. The report confirms what critics of the Pathway, both professionals and family members, have been claiming for years. Indeed it was Freedom of Information Act 2000 requests performed by enterprising journalists that revealed the staggering increase in numbers of patients dying on the Pathway after the 2008 National Strategy incentivised the Pathway to the tune of millions of pounds.

Culture of death?

One hundred and thirty thousand patients a year are dying on the Pathway. Many hospital trusts were paid financial incentives for achieving Pathway uptake targets of two thirds of patient deaths. The report highlighted the grief of families introduced to this culture of death and the lack of compassion of medical professionals using the Pathway, often at a time when family members

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Thackray Williams—Lucy Zhu

Dual-qualified partner joins as head of commercial property department

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Morgan Lewis—David A. McManus

Firm announces appointment of next chair

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Burges Salmon—Rebecca Wilsker

Director joins corporate team from the US

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll