header-logo header-logo

25 July 2013 / Jacqueline Laing
Issue: 7570 / Categories: Opinion , Human rights
printer mail-detail

Institutional human rights abuse?

istock_000009197147medium

Jacqueline Laing & Phil Charlesworth discuss the implications of the Neuberger Review of the Liverpool Care Pathway

The publication of the government-commissioned independent review of the Liverpool Care Pathway (15 July 2013) raises grave concerns about the treatment of patients in hospitals, hospices and care homes in the UK. The report confirms what critics of the Pathway, both professionals and family members, have been claiming for years. Indeed it was Freedom of Information Act 2000 requests performed by enterprising journalists that revealed the staggering increase in numbers of patients dying on the Pathway after the 2008 National Strategy incentivised the Pathway to the tune of millions of pounds.

Culture of death?

One hundred and thirty thousand patients a year are dying on the Pathway. Many hospital trusts were paid financial incentives for achieving Pathway uptake targets of two thirds of patient deaths. The report highlighted the grief of families introduced to this culture of death and the lack of compassion of medical professionals using the Pathway, often at a time when family members

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll