header-logo header-logo

10 February 2011
Issue: 7452 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Insurance

Ground Gilbey Ltd and another company v Jardine Lloyd Thompson UK Ltd [2011] EWHC 124 (Comm), [2011] All ER (D) 38 (Feb)

A broker owes his client a duty to take reasonable steps to obtain a policy which clearly met his client’s needs and was suitable for the client. An aspect of that was that the client should not be exposed to an unnecessary risk of legal disputes with the insurer.

The broker owed his client a duty to draw to the client’s attention any onerous or unusual terms or conditions, and should explain to the client their nature and effect. After the risk had been placed, there was a continuing duty on the broker, when he became aware of information which had a material and potentially deleterious effect on the insurance cover which had placed, to act in his client’s best interest by drawing it to the attention of his client and obtain his instructions in relation to it.
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Foot Anstey—Jasmine Olomolaiye

Investigations and corporate crime specialist joins as partner

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Fieldfisher—Mark Shaw

Veteran funds specialist joins investment funds team

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Taylor Wessing—Stephen Whitfield

Firm enhances competition practice with London partner hire

NEWS
Could an online LLM in Commercial and Technology Law expand your career options?
The controversial Courts and Tribunals Bill has passed its second reading by 304 votes to 203, despite concerted opposition from the legal profession
The presumption of parental involvement is to be abolished, the Lord Chancellor David Lammy has confirmed
A highly experienced chartered legal executive has been prevented from representing her client in financial remedies proceedings, in a case that highlights the continued fallout from Mazur
Plans to commandeer 50%-75% of the interest on lawyers’ client accounts to fund the justice system overlook the cost and administrative burden of this on small and medium law firms, CILEX has warned
back-to-top-scroll