header-logo header-logo

10 February 2011
Issue: 7452 / Categories: Case law , Law digest
printer mail-detail

Insurance

Ground Gilbey Ltd and another company v Jardine Lloyd Thompson UK Ltd [2011] EWHC 124 (Comm), [2011] All ER (D) 38 (Feb)

A broker owes his client a duty to take reasonable steps to obtain a policy which clearly met his client’s needs and was suitable for the client. An aspect of that was that the client should not be exposed to an unnecessary risk of legal disputes with the insurer.

The broker owed his client a duty to draw to the client’s attention any onerous or unusual terms or conditions, and should explain to the client their nature and effect. After the risk had been placed, there was a continuing duty on the broker, when he became aware of information which had a material and potentially deleterious effect on the insurance cover which had placed, to act in his client’s best interest by drawing it to the attention of his client and obtain his instructions in relation to it.
 

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde & Co—Suriya Ashok

Clyde Co strengthens energy transition and construction offering with hire of Suriya Ashok

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit—Nicole Gallop Mildon

Jurit appoints rare dual-qualified lawyer to expand Anglo-French private wealth expertise

NEWS
The Financial Reporting Council’s revised Audit Enforcement Procedure will alter the balance of power in corporate investigations
A telecoms operator may be able to hold over under the Landlord and Tenant Act 1954, yet still be unable to secure a renewal: an outcome described as a legal ‘paradox’

Safety fears do not automatically justify shutting an interested person out of a statutory will application

Consumer credit law is heading for its biggest shake-up in 50 years, with the Consumer Credit Act 1974 set to yield much of its detailed statutory machinery to FCA rules
The Supreme Court has settled a long-running dispute over part-time workers: unfavourable treatment need be a significant or effective cause, not the sole cause
back-to-top-scroll