header-logo header-logo

26 September 2016
Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Insurance lawyers back fixed costs

The Forum of Insurance Lawyers (FOIL) has welcomed proposals to extend fixed recoverable costs, as set out this month in Transforming Our Justice System, a consultation paper by the Lord Chancellor, Lord Chief Justice and Senior President of Tribunals.

FOIL set up a fixed costs working group to focus on the issue in May, and has called for fixed costs on the fast-track and lower reaches of the multi-track in civil claims.

Duncan Rutter, FOIL president, says: “In his speech on fixed costs in January, Lord Justice Jackson said that a fixed costs regime could be delivered within the course of this year, if the political will were there.

“It is encouraging to see that the government, together with the Lord Chief Justice, is showing some determination to extend fixed recoverable costs, not only for clinical negligence and personal injury claims but across the civil justice system. With the work already undertaken on fixed costs by Lord Justice Jackson and the Department of Health it is to be hoped that proposals can be developed and consulted upon within a matter of months.”

Elsewhere, however, lawyers have urged caution on the proposals, which include a £700m pledge to modernise civil courts and tribunals, conduct more litigation online and close “many” of the existing 400 court buildings over the next four years. One of the government’s aims is for the “entire process of civil money claims” to be automated and digitised by 2020, for all civil cases to be started online and for suitable cases to be dealt with entirely online.

Steve Hynes, director of the Legal Action Group, says: “The biggest barriers to access to justice remain financial and the government seems unwilling to address these.”

Chantal-Aimée Doerries QC, Chairman of the Bar, warns there is “a real risk of entrenching a two-tier justice system, providing a different type of justice to claimants and defendants, depending upon the size of the money claims in dispute”.

Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

DWF—David Abbott & Claire Keat

Senior appointments in insurance services and commercial services announced

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Clyde & Co—Nick Roberts

Aviation disputes practice strengthened by London partner hire

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Ellisons—Marion Knocker

Residential property lawyer promoted to partnership

NEWS
he abolition of assured shorthold tenancies and section 21 evictions marks the beginning of a ‘brave new world’ for England’s rental sector, writes Daniel Bacon of Seddons GSC
Stephen Gold’s latest Civil Way column rounds up a flurry of procedural and regulatory changes reshaping housing, alternative dispute resolution (ADR) and personal injury litigation
Patients are being systematically failed by an NHS complaints regime that is opaque, poorly enforced and often stacked against them, argues Charles Davey of The Barrister Group
A wealthy Russian divorce battle has produced a sharp warning about trying to challenge foreign nuptial agreements in the wrong English court. Writing in NLJ this week, Vanessa Friend and Robert Jackson of Hodge Jones & Allen examine Timokhin v Timokhina, where the High Court enforced Russian judgments arising from a prenuptial agreement despite arguments based on the landmark Radmacher decision
An obscure Victorian tort may be heading for an unexpected revival after a significant Privy Council ruling that could reshape liability for dangerous escapes, according to Richard Buckley, barrister and emeritus professor of law at the University of Reading
back-to-top-scroll