header-logo header-logo

16 September 2014 / David Bott
Categories: Features , Insurance surgery
printer mail-detail

Insurance surgery: Giving the green light?

Does the decision in Gavin Edmondson Solicitors v Haven Insurance allow insurers to take client data from the RTA portal, asks David Bott

A recent case has stirred up significant concerns across the personal injury industry. The case deals with insurers approaching clients to settle directly, having obtained their information from the road traffic accident (RTA) portal, in turn by-passing the claimant’s solicitors entirely. So what are the implications of this recent judgment for PI solicitors? Has this case given the green light to insurers to take client data from the portal?

The case 

Last month, His Honour Judge Milwyn Jarman QC handed down judgment in the case of Gavin Edmondson Solicitors v Haven Insurance (13 August 2014, unreported), finding in favour of the defendant insurance company. 

In this case the insurers, Haven, contacted claimants directly using information submitted to the RTA portal. This was despite the claimants having already instructed solicitors who had entered their details onto the centralised system. As a result of Haven’s approach, the claimants accepted

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Fieldfisher—Will Sharp

Fieldfisher—Will Sharp

Fieldfisher boosts structured finance practice with appointment of Will Sharp

gunnercooke—Thomas Bjorn & Peter Rudd-Clarke

gunnercooke—Thomas Bjorn & Peter Rudd-Clarke

gunnercooke grows its life sciences team with new partner hires

Leonard Curtis Legal—Mark Maguire & Kane Jones

Leonard Curtis Legal—Mark Maguire & Kane Jones

Leonard Curtis Legal expands corporate team with twonew appointments

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll