header-logo header-logo

Intelligent litigation

02 June 2011 / Thayne Forbes , Michael Edenborough KC
Issue: 7468 / Categories: Features , Intellectual property
printer mail-detail
hires_10

How can litigation be used to protect IP rights? Michael Edenborough QC & Thayne Forbes explain

IN BRIEF

  • Ensure you know the true value behind intangible assets, such as intellectual property, goodwill and brand value, before entering into a commercial deal.
  • IP’s role and prominence in business is mirrored by its role and prominence in litigation: valuation of IP is often a contentious issue. 
  • When defending the business value held in IP assets, the process used to assess litigation should not be any different to the process used before entering a new market, launching a new product or making an acquisition.

The role of intellectual property has become increasingly significant both in commercial transactions and disputes. IP rights are not only highly valuable but are also complex legally. Litigation is an important part of a commercial toolbox for managing IP rights to optimise their value, and there are many legitimate ways in which it is used.  

Role of IP in commercial deals

Many commercial deals involve IP to some

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Hamlins—Maddox Legal

Hamlins—Maddox Legal

London firm announces acquisition of corporate team

Ward Hadaway—Nik Tunley

Ward Hadaway—Nik Tunley

Head of corporate appointed following Teesside merger

Taylor Rose—Russell Jarvis

Taylor Rose—Russell Jarvis

Firm expands into banking and finance sector with newly appointed head of banking

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll