header-logo header-logo

29 October 2021 / Neil Parpworth
Issue: 7954 / Categories: Features , Public , Criminal
printer mail-detail

Impersonating a police officer: intent to deceive?

62315
Neil Parpworth reports on offences related to the impersonation of a police officer
  • Offences and associated case law regarding the impersonation of police officers, special constables etc.

During the course of the sentencing of Sarah Everard’s murderer to a whole-life term of imprisonment, one of the factors to emerge was that he had used his warrant card to facilitate the detention and abduction of his victim. At the time that he committed his heinous crimes, the defendant was a serving officer in the Metropolitan Police Force. The warrant card which he possessed was therefore a valid form of ID common to all police officers in England and Wales.

It is worth noting, however, that there is a small collection of offences on the statute book which relate to matters such as impersonating a police officer. In the discussion which follows, they will be considered, along with the associated case law.

The offences

Section 90

Section 90 of the Police Act 1996 (PA 1996) is the latest

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll