header-logo header-logo

International fraud prompts fast action on jurisdiction

181424
Christian Tuddenham & Tracey Lattimer highlight the English courts’ pragmatic approach to third-party disclosure
  • Covers jurisdiction issues and third-party disclosure orders in Tonstate Group v Wojakovski and other cases.
  • Highlights that English courts are willing to overcome jurisdictional obstacles as far as possible in cases involving international fraud.

In a recent decision in Tonstate Group Ltd (in liquidation) & Ors v Edward Wojakovski & Ors [2024] EWHC 1196 (Ch), [2024] All ER (D) 87 (May), the English High Court affirmed its ability and willingness to issue third-party disclosure orders against individuals resident abroad, particularly in cases concerning fraud.

Background to the disclosure ­application

The claimant companies were victims of a fraud perpetrated by Edward Wojakovski, whereby approximately £13.5m of company funds were illegitimately extracted (the extractions). Judgment in connection with this fraud was entered against Wojakovski in January 2020, recognising the claimants’ proprietary interest in the extractions. Since that date, the claimants have been seeking to recover the extractions.

To assist with their recovery

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The dangers of uncritical artificial intelligence (AI) use in legal practice are no longer hypothetical. In this week's NLJ, Dr Charanjit Singh of Holborn Chambers examines cases where lawyers relied on ‘hallucinated’ citations — entirely fictitious authorities generated by AI tools
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
back-to-top-scroll