header-logo header-logo

The international pricing dilemma

09 June 2017 / Richard Burcher , Richard Burcher
Issue: 7749 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

In the cauldron of the modern legal market, is ‘Big Law’ still the strongest spell in town? Richard Burcher reports

As a legal pricing specialist, I spend a lot of time talking to law firms around the world. Pricing is a big issue in the international legal market, with flexibility and innovation becoming essential. The spell cast by large international firms is still strong, and many of them are alert to the challenges and the need for agility. But I see growing evidence that international reach is being eroded as a competitive advantage by the rise of powerful international networks and alliances. More and more clients are seeking value from their legal spend by turning to mid-market independent law firms—a part of the market where international networks and alliances represent a viable alternative even for client firms operating in global markets.

Boutiques and alternative providers are also adding to the mix. But whether a firm is a fully integrated international behemoth, a ‘verein’ (a structured but independent network), ‘best-friends’ or some variation

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll