header-logo header-logo

The international pricing dilemma

09 June 2017 / Richard Burcher , Richard Burcher
Issue: 7749 / Categories: Features , Profession
printer mail-detail

In the cauldron of the modern legal market, is ‘Big Law’ still the strongest spell in town? Richard Burcher reports

As a legal pricing specialist, I spend a lot of time talking to law firms around the world. Pricing is a big issue in the international legal market, with flexibility and innovation becoming essential. The spell cast by large international firms is still strong, and many of them are alert to the challenges and the need for agility. But I see growing evidence that international reach is being eroded as a competitive advantage by the rise of powerful international networks and alliances. More and more clients are seeking value from their legal spend by turning to mid-market independent law firms—a part of the market where international networks and alliances represent a viable alternative even for client firms operating in global markets.

Boutiques and alternative providers are also adding to the mix. But whether a firm is a fully integrated international behemoth, a ‘verein’ (a structured but independent network), ‘best-friends’ or some variation

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Steven James

Pillsbury—Steven James

Firm boosts London IP capability with high-profile technology sector hire

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Clarke Willmott—Michelle Seddon

Private client specialist joins as partner in Taunton office

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

DWF—Rory White-Andrews

Finance and restructuring offering strengthened by partner hire in London

NEWS
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys LLP [2025] EWHC 2341 (KB) continues to stir controversy across civil litigation, according to NLJ columnist Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School—AKA ‘The insider’
SRA v Goodwin is a rare disciplinary decision where a solicitor found to have acted dishonestly avoided being struck off, says Clare Hughes-Williams of DAC Beachcroft in this week's NLJ. The Solicitors Disciplinary Tribunal (SDT) imposed a 12-month suspension instead, citing medical evidence and the absence of harm to clients
In their latest Family Law Brief for NLJ, Ellie Hampson-Jones and Carla Ditz of Stewarts review three key family law rulings, including the latest instalment in the long-running saga of Potanin v Potanina
The Asian International Arbitration Centre’s sweeping reforms through its AIAC Suite of Rules 2026, unveiled at Asia ADR Week, are under examination in this week's NLJ by John (Ching Jack) Choi of Gresham Legal
In this week's issue of NLJ, Yasseen Gailani and Alexander Martin of Quinn Emanuel report on the High Court’s decision in Skatteforvaltningen (SKAT) v Solo Capital Partners LLP & Ors [2025], where Denmark’s tax authority failed to recover £1.4bn in disputed dividend tax refunds
back-to-top-scroll