header-logo header-logo

International relocation with children (Pt 2)

03 October 2025 / Victoria Rylatt , Robyn Laye
Issue: 8133 / Categories: Features , Family , Divorce , Child law , International
printer mail-detail
231387
Recent judgments illustrate the highly complex & sensitive nature of international relocation cases, as Victoria Rylatt & Robyn Laye explain

In brief

  • Reviews three recent family court decisions involving international relocation applications by parents, highlighting the nuanced judicial balancing of children’s welfare, parental rights, and practical realities.
  • Across all cases, courts applied the welfare checklist and considered children’s wishes, emotional wellbeing, and continuity of relationships—reinforcing that each decision is fact-specific and guided by the best interests of the child.

In Part 1 of this update, we looked at cases involving previous findings of fact (see NLJ, 26 September 2025 p13). Here we look at some further cases which provide us with a valuable insight into the court’s approach towards these difficult and finely balanced decisions.

A father v A mother [2024] EWFC 381 (B)

This case concerned the mother’s application for permission to relocate with the parties’ two children, a son and a daughter, to Australia, and the father’s application

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

NLJ Career Profile: Kate Gaskell, Flex Legal

Kate Gaskell, CEO of Flex Legal, reflects on chasing her childhood dreams underscores the importance of welcoming those from all backgrounds into the profession

Dorsey & Whitney—Jonathan Christy

Dorsey & Whitney—Jonathan Christy

Dispute resolution team welcomes associate in London

Winckworth Sherwood—Kevin McManamon

Winckworth Sherwood—Kevin McManamon

Special education needs and mental capacity expert joins as partner

NEWS
Overcrowded prisons, mental health hospitals and immigration centres are failing to meet international and domestic human rights standards, the National Preventive Mechanism (NPM) has warned
Two speedier and more streamlined qualification routes have been launched for probate and conveyancing professionals
Workplace stress was a contributing factor in almost one in eight cases before the employment tribunal last year, indicating its endemic grip on the UK workplace
In Ward v Rai, the High Court reaffirmed that imprecise points of dispute can and will be struck out. Writing in NLJ this week, Amy Dunkley of Bolt Burdon Kemp reports on the decision and its implications for practitioners
Could the Supreme Court’s ruling in R v Hayes; R v Palombo unintentionally unsettle future complex fraud trials? Maia Cohen-Lask of Corker Binning explores the question in NLJ this week
back-to-top-scroll