header-logo header-logo

23 March 2007 / Richard Scorer
Issue: 7265 / Categories: Opinion , Media , Regulatory , Child law
printer mail-detail

Internet sends mixed messages

Are websites responsible for users’ behaviour? Richard Scorer asks where we should draw the line online

“Perverts keep out: the government gets tough on internet paedophiles who groom vulnerable youngsters online.” This was a headline in The York Press, 7 February 2007, following the announcement by Home Secretary John Reid of “tough new measures” to force internet paedophiles to register their online nicknames and e-mail addresses with the authorities. Reid also ordered a feasibility study of an online alarm system that would notify police every time a convicted paedophile uses registered details to log on to an internet chatroom.

Reid’s crackdown was intended to mark European Internet Safety Day. Unfortunately, the Home Secretary’s timing was inauspicious. Just as Reid announced his plans, the prison overcrowding crisis erupted into a political row when a judge refused to send an internet paedophile to jail because of the shortage of prison places. Derek Williams’s six-month sentence for downloading child pornography was changed to a suspended sentence, apparently following the Home Office’s instruction that only ‘serious

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll