header-logo header-logo

Internet sends mixed messages

23 March 2007 / Richard Scorer
Issue: 7265 / Categories: Opinion , Media , Regulatory , Child law
printer mail-detail

Are websites responsible for users’ behaviour? Richard Scorer asks where we should draw the line online

“Perverts keep out: the government gets tough on internet paedophiles who groom vulnerable youngsters online.” This was a headline in The York Press, 7 February 2007, following the announcement by Home Secretary John Reid of “tough new measures” to force internet paedophiles to register their online nicknames and e-mail addresses with the authorities. Reid also ordered a feasibility study of an online alarm system that would notify police every time a convicted paedophile uses registered details to log on to an internet chatroom.

Reid’s crackdown was intended to mark European Internet Safety Day. Unfortunately, the Home Secretary’s timing was inauspicious. Just as Reid announced his plans, the prison overcrowding crisis erupted into a political row when a judge refused to send an internet paedophile to jail because of the shortage of prison places. Derek Williams’s six-month sentence for downloading child pornography was changed to a suspended sentence, apparently following the Home Office’s instruction that only ‘serious

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll