header-logo header-logo

15 April 2010 / Michael Tringham
Issue: 7413 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Intestacy the NSW way

Michael Tringham examines legal changes down under

With the Law Commission’s current consultation on “Intestacy and Family Provision Claims on Death” in mind, attention is drawn to New South Wales’ new intestacy laws. Part of the overall push for the harmonisation of succession laws throughout Australia, they change how an estate is to be distributed when a person dies without a will. I am indebted to Sandra Rocha of Sydney law firm SWAAB for her succinct analysis of the Succession Act 2006 as amended.

As of 1 March 2010 “spouse” includes a married, or a domestic partner who may be of the same or opposite sex. If an intestate had multiple spouses—that is, a relationship with their married partner and one or more domestic partners all at the same time—they will all share the estate, either by written agreement or court order. A “domestic partner” is one who had been continuously for at least two years in what used to be called a de facto relationship or that had resulted in the birth of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans—Jason Slatcher

Weightmans appoint new Chief Technology Officer

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya—trainees

Mishcon de Reya announces trainee retention rate of 86%

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers—Charlotte Adams & Fraser Sutton

Sackers welcomes two new Graduate Solicitor Apprentices

NEWS
LexisNexis is delighted to announce the launch of the LexisNexis Legal Awards 2027, celebrating outstanding achievement, innovation and impact across the legal profession
The Legal Services Board (LSB) is to take further enforcement action against the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA), setting additional performance targets and ‘intensifying’ its oversight, it has said
Regulators missed several opportunities to intervene in PM Law Group before it collapsed, an independent review by City firm Jenner & Block has found
An employer’s vicarious liability for the alleged torts of an employee cannot be transferred by TUPE, the Court of Appeal has confirmed
Tiered fees of up to £1,500 for Legal Ombudsman (LeO) cases could leave firms with little option but to pay out, lawyers have warned
back-to-top-scroll