header-logo header-logo

15 April 2010 / Michael Tringham
Issue: 7413 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Intestacy the NSW way

Michael Tringham examines legal changes down under

With the Law Commission’s current consultation on “Intestacy and Family Provision Claims on Death” in mind, attention is drawn to New South Wales’ new intestacy laws. Part of the overall push for the harmonisation of succession laws throughout Australia, they change how an estate is to be distributed when a person dies without a will. I am indebted to Sandra Rocha of Sydney law firm SWAAB for her succinct analysis of the Succession Act 2006 as amended.

As of 1 March 2010 “spouse” includes a married, or a domestic partner who may be of the same or opposite sex. If an intestate had multiple spouses—that is, a relationship with their married partner and one or more domestic partners all at the same time—they will all share the estate, either by written agreement or court order. A “domestic partner” is one who had been continuously for at least two years in what used to be called a de facto relationship or that had resulted in the birth of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
back-to-top-scroll