header-logo header-logo

Intestacy the NSW way

15 April 2010 / Michael Tringham
Issue: 7413 / Categories: Features , Wills & Probate
printer mail-detail

Michael Tringham examines legal changes down under

With the Law Commission’s current consultation on “Intestacy and Family Provision Claims on Death” in mind, attention is drawn to New South Wales’ new intestacy laws. Part of the overall push for the harmonisation of succession laws throughout Australia, they change how an estate is to be distributed when a person dies without a will. I am indebted to Sandra Rocha of Sydney law firm SWAAB for her succinct analysis of the Succession Act 2006 as amended.

As of 1 March 2010 “spouse” includes a married, or a domestic partner who may be of the same or opposite sex. If an intestate had multiple spouses—that is, a relationship with their married partner and one or more domestic partners all at the same time—they will all share the estate, either by written agreement or court order. A “domestic partner” is one who had been continuously for at least two years in what used to be called a de facto relationship or that had resulted in the birth of

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll