header-logo header-logo

10 February 2017
Issue: 7733 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Investigatory powers

R (on the application of Privacy International) v Investigatory Powers Tribunal [2017] EWHC 114 (Admin), [2017] All ER (D) 25 (Feb)

The Divisional Court held that judicial review did not lie against the defendant Investigatory Powers Tribunal’s (the IPT) decision against the claimant Privacy International’s application. The Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000 provided for the secretary of state to authorise an appeal in the particular circumstances of the case and the IPT’s decision and judicial review did not lie.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Ogier—Martin Livingston

Martin Livingston joins Ogier in Cayman to strengthen regulatory support

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan—47 promotions

Blake Morgan announces 47 summer promotions across UK offices

NEWS
Consultant-led law firms should prepare for closer regulatory attention as oversight evolves
Artificial intelligence may draft workplace grievances, but employers cannot treat them any differently from conventional complaints
From dishonest claimants to judicial promotions and procedural skirmishes, the latest legal developments offer plenty for litigators to digest
Fresh guidance is set to influence how courts decide whether hearings take place online or in person
County Court judges remain divided over whether landlords can lawfully force entry to carry out essential safety inspections after tenants ignore access injunctions
back-to-top-scroll