header-logo header-logo

THIS ISSUE
Card image

Issue: Vol 167, Issue 7733

10 February 2017
IN THIS ISSUE

Wilkes v DePuy International Limited [2016] EWHC 3096 (QB), [2016] All ER (D) 121 (Dec)

Lewin v Glaxo Operations UK Ltd (sued as Glaxosmithkline Unlimited) [2016] EWHC 3331 (QB), [2016] All ER (D) 122 (Dec)

Loterie Nationale -- Nationale Loterij NV van publiek recht v Adriaensen and others C-667/15, [2017] All ER (D) 15 (Feb)

A play by Kerry Underwood

Kuznetsov v Royal Bank of Scotland plc [2017] EWCA Civ 43, [2017] All ER (D) 22 (Feb)

R (on the application of TN (Vietnam) and another) v Secretary of State for the Home Department and another [2017] EWHC 59 (Admin), [2017] All ER (D) 90 (Jan)

Michael Zander QC picks out crucial passages from the dissenting Supreme Court justices on the triggering of Art 50

R (on the application of Privacy International) v Investigatory Powers Tribunal [2017] EWHC 114 (Admin), [2017] All ER (D) 25 (Feb)

More paper for non-moles; destroying a buffet; & Court of Appeal fix

Akers and others v Samba Financial Group [2017] UKSC 6, [2017] All ER (D) 06 (Feb)

Show
10
Results
Results
10
Results

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Family law boutique expands London team with legal director hire

Ward Hadaway—Mike Gore

Ward Hadaway—Mike Gore

Firm enhances advisory capability with strategic risk specialist hire

Stewarts—Alexandra Lyons

Stewarts—Alexandra Lyons

Insurance and reinsurance specialist joins policyholder disputes practice as partner

NEWS
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
The fallout from Lord Mandelson’s appointment and dismissal as UK ambassador to Washington raises profound questions about constitutional governance, accountability and political appointments
Pastries may be in the firing line while kebabs escape scrutiny, but the reality is far more nuanced
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
back-to-top-scroll