header-logo header-logo

10 February 2017
Issue: 7733 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Employment tribunal

Kuznetsov v Royal Bank of Scotland plc [2017] EWCA Civ 43, [2017] All ER (D) 22 (Feb)

The Court of Appeal dismissed an appeal by an employee against a decision not to allow an amendment to his case against the employer bank to add the allegation of whistle blowing. When one added the various factors identified by the employment tribunal, the decision to refuse the amendment was a decision which had plainly been open to it.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Burgess Mee—Victoria Sterritt

Family law boutique expands London team with legal director hire

Ward Hadaway—Mike Gore

Ward Hadaway—Mike Gore

Firm enhances advisory capability with strategic risk specialist hire

Stewarts—Alexandra Lyons

Stewarts—Alexandra Lyons

Insurance and reinsurance specialist joins policyholder disputes practice as partner

NEWS
Some employment law controversies never disappear—they merely lie dormant
Artificial intelligence (AI) is transforming legal practice, but its successful adoption depends as much on culture as technology
The fallout from Lord Mandelson’s appointment and dismissal as UK ambassador to Washington raises profound questions about constitutional governance, accountability and political appointments
Pastries may be in the firing line while kebabs escape scrutiny, but the reality is far more nuanced
The Supreme Court’s decision in Dillon highlights a central tension in modern public law: rights may be recognised without being fully realised
back-to-top-scroll