header-logo header-logo

22 September 2017
Issue: 6672 / Categories: Case law , Law digest , In Court
printer mail-detail

Investigatory powers

Andrew v Metropolitan Police Commissioner [2017] UKIPTrib IPT_29_17_CH, [2017] All ER (D) 233 (Jul)

The obtaining of the complainants’ communications data by authorisations granted under the Regulation of Investigatory Powers Act 2000, s 22(3) had been unlawful. Accordingly, the Investigatory Powers Tribunal quashed the authorisations, and ordered the communications data obtained under them to be deleted, with an exception and the respondent Metropolitan Police Commissioner to pay the first complainant compensation of £5,000, as there was a sufficient causal connection between the infringement of her rights and the stress condition diagnosed.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Shakespeare Martineau—Marie Bourke

Shakespeare Martineau—Marie Bourke

Shakespeare Martineau strengthens Sheffield regulatory practice with new hires

Sackers—Louise McRae & Annabella Hwang

Sackers—Louise McRae & Annabella Hwang

Sackers recruits new associates

McHale & Co—Shaun Little & Patrick Byrne

McHale & Co—Shaun Little & Patrick Byrne

Firm bolsters senior team with head of corporate and head of employment

NEWS
A wide-ranging Civil Way column highlights developments from insolvency procedure to employment law, but one case stands out for its lessons on bankruptcy, family homes and digital communications
A sprawling Intellectual Property Office battle between House of Fraser and Frasers Property has delivered a masterclass in modern trade mark law
Courts in England and Wales and Singapore are increasingly confronting complex disputes over international child relocation as families become more globally mobile
The government’s long-awaited family law reform consultation could mark a turning point for domestic abuse victims navigating financial remedy proceedings, but significant challenges remain
A new commercial court pilot giving the public access to documents used in hearings, including expert reports, is raising difficult questions about transparency and privacy
back-to-top-scroll