header-logo header-logo

27 November 2008
Issue: 7347 / Categories: Legal News , Intellectual property
printer mail-detail

IP claims leap

Intellectual Property

Companies are acting quicker and with greater regularity to protect their intellectual property rights.

According to judicial statistics, intellectual property claims made in the High Court have risen by 83% in the past year.

Passing off and trademark infringement claims have seen the biggest rise, leaping 136%, from 50 to 118 cases between 2006 and 2007.

Notably, claims involving confidential information jumped to 21 in 2007 from just three in 2006.

Mark Finn, intellectual property specialist at EMW Picton Howell, says that companies are becoming increasingly aware of the value of their products.

“Often the intellectual property will be the biggest single asset a company has. As businesses try to protect their profit margins and maintain market share as the economy slows, they try to be more prepared than in the good times to fight to defend their brands and other intellectual property rights against competitors,” he says.

Finn says that IP cases tend to feed through to the courts more quickly than other types of claims as companies have to act quickly

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll