header-logo header-logo

07 January 2011
Issue: 7447 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Irish abortion laws contravene Art 8

Ireland must reconsider its laws and policies on abortion after a ruling by the European Court of Human Rights (ECtHR).

A, B and C v Ireland (App No 25579/05) concerned a woman who had suffered from a rare form of cancer that she feared would return as a result of her pregnancy and who was refused an abortion. She also feared there would be a risk to the foetus if she continued to term, and claimed she could not obtain clear advice.

The ECtHR held unanimously that there had been a breach of Art 8, right to private and family life. It found the Irish government had failed to properly implement its law that an abortion is lawful where the woman’s life is at risk.
The ECtHR held that “neither the medical consultation nor litigation options, relied on by the Irish government, constituted effective and accessible procedures which allowed the third applicant to establish her right to a lawful abortion in Ireland”. It noted that women and their doctors ran a risk of conviction and

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley—Jordan Wallace

Thomson Hayton Winkley strengthens family law team

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Ward Hadaway—Barnaby Rosenthall

Construction lawyer returns to Ward Hadaway in Teesside role

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird & Bird—Shahin Baghaei

Bird Bird hires leading legal transformation expert

NEWS
Legal aid deserts leave almost one in four without adequate access to justice
The Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has warned solicitors and law firms that using artificial intelligence does not alter their professional obligations, amid concerns over inaccurate legal material and client confidentiality
From forgotten interest claims to case-management appeals, a string of procedural developments offers useful—and occasionally cautionary—lessons for practitioners

Jonathan Fisher KC highlights that it now accounts for around 40% of criminal offences, with roughly 70% involving technology, and argues that the UK cannot simply prosecute its way out of the problem. Detection, investigation and prosecution all require improvement, while different fraud types demand tailored responses.

How forcefully can a litigant criticise a public authority before robust advocacy crosses the line into unreasonable conduct? 
back-to-top-scroll