header-logo header-logo

15 December 2023 / Simon Parsons
Issue: 8053 / Categories: Features , Profession , International justice
printer mail-detail

Is international law losing its relevance?

151419
Simon Parsons expresses concern about the rise of tribalism & resort to force
  • Briefly charts the development of international law since 1945.
  • Notes the restraints on the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court.
  • Refers to international law aspects of ongoing military conflicts.

The conviction of the Nazi criminals in 1945 for horrific international crimes was to punish the criminals but also to act as a deterrent to others. The purpose of the United Nations, which was founded in 1945, was to establish an effective body built on collective security with strong enforcement powers. But this did not happen because there is no international police force or comprehensive system of international law enforcement. There is no supreme executive authority. The UN Security Council can authorise the use of force to compel states to comply with its decisions but there must be a prior act of aggression or the threat of such an act. Enforcement action can be vetoed by any of the Council’s five permanent members (China, France, Russia,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Jackson Lees Group—Jannina Barker, Laura Beattie & Catherine McCrindle

Firm promotes senior associate and team leader as wills, trusts and probate team expands

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Asserson—Michael Francos-Downs

Manchester real estate finance practice welcomes legal director

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll