header-logo header-logo

Is international law losing its relevance?

15 December 2023 / Simon Parsons
Issue: 8053 / Categories: Features , Profession , International justice
printer mail-detail
151419
Simon Parsons expresses concern about the rise of tribalism & resort to force
  • Briefly charts the development of international law since 1945.
  • Notes the restraints on the jurisdiction of the International Criminal Court.
  • Refers to international law aspects of ongoing military conflicts.

The conviction of the Nazi criminals in 1945 for horrific international crimes was to punish the criminals but also to act as a deterrent to others. The purpose of the United Nations, which was founded in 1945, was to establish an effective body built on collective security with strong enforcement powers. But this did not happen because there is no international police force or comprehensive system of international law enforcement. There is no supreme executive authority. The UN Security Council can authorise the use of force to compel states to comply with its decisions but there must be a prior act of aggression or the threat of such an act. Enforcement action can be vetoed by any of the Council’s five permanent members (China, France, Russia,

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Gilson Gray—Jeremy Davy

Partner appointed as head of residential conveyancing for England

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

DR Solicitors—Paul Edels

Specialist firm enhances corporate healthcare practice with partner appointment

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll