header-logo header-logo

Post Brownlie: Is it time to amend the tort gateway?

04 March 2022 / Andrew Barns-Graham
Issue: 7969 / Categories: Features , Personal injury , Jurisdiction
printer mail-detail
73854
Andrew Barns-Graham offers some reflections on the jurisdictional gateway, in light of Brownlie
  • Looks at FS Cairo (Nile Plaza) LLC v Brownlie (as dependant and executrix of Sir Ian Brownlie CBE QC).
  • Discusses narrow and broad interpretation of ‘damage’.
  • Asserts both interpretations are flawed, and suggests amending the ‘gateway’.

Under the English common law, a claimant seeking the court’s permission to serve proceedings out of the jurisdiction must demonstrate a serious issue to be tried, a good arguable case that each claim satisfies a jurisdictional gateway in Practice Direction 6B, and that England is the forum conveniens and the court should exercise its discretion to permit service.

Each part of this test serves a distinct purpose. The merits threshold protects foreign defendants from being dragged to England to defend unmeritorious claims. The gateways prevent the English courts from hearing disputes lacking any substantial connection to this jurisdiction. The forum conveniens assessment occurs because, even where such a connection does exist, this does not necessarily

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

Forum of Insurance Lawyers elects president for 2026

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Partner joinslabour and employment practice in London

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

NEWS
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll