header-logo header-logo

04 March 2022 / Andrew Barns-Graham
Issue: 7969 / Categories: Features , Personal injury , Jurisdiction
printer mail-detail

Post Brownlie: Is it time to amend the tort gateway?

73854
Andrew Barns-Graham offers some reflections on the jurisdictional gateway, in light of Brownlie
  • Looks at FS Cairo (Nile Plaza) LLC v Brownlie (as dependant and executrix of Sir Ian Brownlie CBE QC).
  • Discusses narrow and broad interpretation of ‘damage’.
  • Asserts both interpretations are flawed, and suggests amending the ‘gateway’.

Under the English common law, a claimant seeking the court’s permission to serve proceedings out of the jurisdiction must demonstrate a serious issue to be tried, a good arguable case that each claim satisfies a jurisdictional gateway in Practice Direction 6B, and that England is the forum conveniens and the court should exercise its discretion to permit service.

Each part of this test serves a distinct purpose. The merits threshold protects foreign defendants from being dragged to England to defend unmeritorious claims. The gateways prevent the English courts from hearing disputes lacking any substantial connection to this jurisdiction. The forum conveniens assessment occurs because, even where such a connection does exist, this does not necessarily

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

NLJ Career Profile: Ken Fowlie, Stowe Family Law

Ken Fowlie, chairman of Stowe Family Law, reflects on more than 30 years in legal services after ‘falling into law’

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Gardner Leader—Michelle Morgan & Catherine Morris

Regional law firm expands employment team with partner and senior associate hires

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Freeths—Carly Harwood & Tom Newton

Nottinghamtrusts, estates and tax team welcomes two senior associates

NEWS
Children can claim for ‘lost years’ damages in personal injury cases, the Supreme Court has held in a landmark judgment
The cab-rank rule remains a bulwark of the rule of law, yet lawyers are increasingly judged by their clients’ causes. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian McDougall, president of the LexisNexis Rule of Law Foundation, warns that conflating representation with endorsement is a ‘clear and present danger’
Holiday lets may promise easy returns, but restrictive covenants can swiftly scupper plans. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Francis of Serle Court recounts how covenants limiting use to a ‘private dwelling house’ or ‘private residence’ have repeatedly defeated short-term letting schemes
Artificial intelligence (AI) is already embedded in the civil courts, but regulation lags behind practice. Writing in NLJ this week, Ben Roe of Baker McKenzie charts a landscape where AI assists with transcription, case management and document handling, yet raises acute concerns over evidence, advocacy and even judgment-writing
The Supreme Court has drawn a firm line under branding creativity in regulated markets. In Dairy UK Ltd v Oatly AB, it ruled that Oatly’s ‘post-milk generation’ trade mark unlawfully deployed a protected dairy designation. In NLJ this week, Asima Rana of DWF explains that the court prioritised ‘regulatory clarity over creative branding choices’, holding that ‘designation’ extends beyond product names to marketing slogans
back-to-top-scroll