header-logo header-logo

04 March 2022 / Andrew Barns-Graham
Issue: 7969 / Categories: Features , Personal injury , Jurisdiction
printer mail-detail

Post Brownlie: Is it time to amend the tort gateway?

73854
Andrew Barns-Graham offers some reflections on the jurisdictional gateway, in light of Brownlie
  • Looks at FS Cairo (Nile Plaza) LLC v Brownlie (as dependant and executrix of Sir Ian Brownlie CBE QC).
  • Discusses narrow and broad interpretation of ‘damage’.
  • Asserts both interpretations are flawed, and suggests amending the ‘gateway’.

Under the English common law, a claimant seeking the court’s permission to serve proceedings out of the jurisdiction must demonstrate a serious issue to be tried, a good arguable case that each claim satisfies a jurisdictional gateway in Practice Direction 6B, and that England is the forum conveniens and the court should exercise its discretion to permit service.

Each part of this test serves a distinct purpose. The merits threshold protects foreign defendants from being dragged to England to defend unmeritorious claims. The gateways prevent the English courts from hearing disputes lacking any substantial connection to this jurisdiction. The forum conveniens assessment occurs because, even where such a connection does exist, this does not necessarily

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
Contract damages are usually assessed at the date of breach—but not always. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Gascoigne, knowledge lawyer at LexisNexis, examines the growing body of cases where courts have allowed later events to reshape compensation
The Supreme Court has restored ‘doctrinal coherence’ to unfair prejudice litigation, writes Natalie Quinlivan, partner at Fieldfisher LLP, in this week' NLJ
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts
back-to-top-scroll