header-logo header-logo

04 March 2022 / Andrew Barns-Graham
Issue: 7969 / Categories: Features , Personal injury , Jurisdiction
printer mail-detail

Post Brownlie: Is it time to amend the tort gateway?

73854
Andrew Barns-Graham offers some reflections on the jurisdictional gateway, in light of Brownlie
  • Looks at FS Cairo (Nile Plaza) LLC v Brownlie (as dependant and executrix of Sir Ian Brownlie CBE QC).
  • Discusses narrow and broad interpretation of ‘damage’.
  • Asserts both interpretations are flawed, and suggests amending the ‘gateway’.

Under the English common law, a claimant seeking the court’s permission to serve proceedings out of the jurisdiction must demonstrate a serious issue to be tried, a good arguable case that each claim satisfies a jurisdictional gateway in Practice Direction 6B, and that England is the forum conveniens and the court should exercise its discretion to permit service.

Each part of this test serves a distinct purpose. The merits threshold protects foreign defendants from being dragged to England to defend unmeritorious claims. The gateways prevent the English courts from hearing disputes lacking any substantial connection to this jurisdiction. The forum conveniens assessment occurs because, even where such a connection does exist, this does not necessarily

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Cripps—Radius Law

Cripps—Radius Law

Commercial and technology practice boosted by team hire

Switalskis—Grimsby

Switalskis—Grimsby

Firm expands with new Grimsby office to serve North East Lincolnshire

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Slater Heelis—Will Newman & Lucy Spilsbury

Property team boosted by two solicitor appointments

NEWS
The Supreme Court has delivered a decisive ruling on termination under the JCT Design & Build form. Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Singer KC and Jonathan Ward, of Kings Chambers, analyse Providence Building Services v Hexagon Housing Association [2026] UKSC 1, which restores the first-instance decision and curbs contractors’ termination rights for repeated late payment
Secondments, disciplinary procedures and appeal chaos all feature in a quartet of recent rulings. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, examines how established principles are being tested in modern disputes
The AI revolution is no longer a distant murmur—it’s at the client’s desk. Writing in NLJ this week, Peter Ambrose, CEO of The Partnership and Legalito, warns that the ‘AI chickens’ have ‘come home to roost’, transforming not just legal practice but the lawyer–client relationship itself
A High Court ruling involving the Longleat estate has exposed the fault line between modern family building and historic trust drafting. Writing in NLJ this week, Charlotte Coyle, director and family law expert at Freeths, examines Cator v Thynn [2026] EWHC 209 (Ch), where trustees sought approval to modernise trusts that retain pre-1970 definitions of ‘child’, ‘grandchild’ and ‘issue’
Fresh proposals to criminalise ‘nudification’ apps, prioritise cyberflashing and non-consensual intimate images, and even ban under-16s from social media have reignited debate over whether the Online Safety Act 2023 (OSA 2023) is fit for purpose. Writing in NLJ this week, Alexander Brown, head of technology, media and telecommunications, and Alexandra Webster, managing associate, Simmons & Simmons, caution against reactive law-making that could undermine the Act’s ‘risk-based and outcomes-focused’ design
back-to-top-scroll