header-logo header-logo

Post Brownlie: Is it time to amend the tort gateway?

04 March 2022 / Andrew Barns-Graham
Issue: 7969 / Categories: Features , Personal injury , Jurisdiction
printer mail-detail
73854
Andrew Barns-Graham offers some reflections on the jurisdictional gateway, in light of Brownlie
  • Looks at FS Cairo (Nile Plaza) LLC v Brownlie (as dependant and executrix of Sir Ian Brownlie CBE QC).
  • Discusses narrow and broad interpretation of ‘damage’.
  • Asserts both interpretations are flawed, and suggests amending the ‘gateway’.

Under the English common law, a claimant seeking the court’s permission to serve proceedings out of the jurisdiction must demonstrate a serious issue to be tried, a good arguable case that each claim satisfies a jurisdictional gateway in Practice Direction 6B, and that England is the forum conveniens and the court should exercise its discretion to permit service.

Each part of this test serves a distinct purpose. The merits threshold protects foreign defendants from being dragged to England to defend unmeritorious claims. The gateways prevent the English courts from hearing disputes lacking any substantial connection to this jurisdiction. The forum conveniens assessment occurs because, even where such a connection does exist, this does not necessarily

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll