header-logo header-logo

11 April 2025 / Mark Jones , Alex Curran
Issue: 8112 / Categories: Opinion , Legal services , Criminal , Family , ADR , Rule of law
printer mail-detail

Is this justice?

215640
Planned cuts to the Civil Service risk adding further pressure to a public court system already at breaking point: Mark Jones & Alex Curran report on the deepening crisis

Ever since Rachel Reeves entered No 11 on 5 July 2024, she has made no secret of the need for central government to tighten the proverbial purse strings. While some commentators may be more focused on her money-saving measures announced in the Spring Statement on 26 March 2025, three days earlier the Chancellor announced that she planned to cut government departmental costs by 15% by the end of the decade, and would do so by slashing the Civil Service’s budget.

The prospect of further cuts to a public court system that is already at breaking point will send shivers down the spine of any court user, be they a professional or lay member of the public.

Current court backlogs

Justice delayed is justice denied, and that applies to all parties involved in cases before the family and criminal courts.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Clarke Willmott—Matthew Roach

Partner joins commercial property team in Taunton office

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Farrer & Co—Richard Lane

Londstanding London firm appoints new senior partner

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Bird & Bird—Sue McLean

Commercial team in London welcomes technology specialist as partner

NEWS
What safeguards apply when trust corporations are appointed as deputy by the Court of Protection? 
Disputing parties are expected to take part in alternative dispute resolution (ADR), where this is suitable for their case. At what point, however, does refusing to participate cross the threshold of ‘unreasonable’ and attract adverse costs consequences?
When it comes to free legal advice, demand massively outweighs supply. 'Millions of people are excluded from access to justice as they don’t have anywhere to turn for free advice—or don’t know that they can ask for help,' Bhavini Bhatt, development director at the Access to Justice Foundation, writes in this week's NLJ
When an ex-couple is deciding who gets what in the divorce or civil partnership dissolution, when is it appropriate for a third party to intervene? David Burrows, NLJ columnist and solicitor advocate, considers this thorny issue in this week’s NLJ
NLJ's latest Charities Appeals Supplement has been published in this week’s issue
back-to-top-scroll