header-logo header-logo

03 July 2015 / Charles Pigott
Issue: 7659 / Categories: Features , Discrimination , Human rights
printer mail-detail

It’ll all end in tiers

nlj_7659_pigott

Charles Pigott explains how Christian bakers came unstuck over a “gay cake”

The facts in Lee v Ashers Baking Co Ltd and others [2015] NICty 2 took place just after the Northern Ireland Assembly had voted for the third time against same sex marriage in April 2014.

Gareth Lee had asked Ashers—a substantial bakery company run by a Christian couple Colin and Karen McArthur—to bake a cake to his own design. This was a service widely advertised by the company. His design incorporated a coloured picture of the Sesame Street puppets Bert and Ernie, the logo of QueerSpace (a charity promoting LGBT rights) and the headline caption “Support Gay Marriage”. Although his order was at first accepted when he came into the shop, it was subsequently declined and his money refunded. Mrs McArthur said in evidence that the problem was the message on the cake, because as a Christian she did not support gay marriage.

The judge found that Mr and Mrs McArthur knew that Mr Lee was gay or associated with

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll