header-logo header-logo

It ought to be stopped

02 April 2015 / Andrew Francis
Issue: 7647 / Categories: Features , Property
printer mail-detail
nlj_7647_andrew-francis

Andrew Francis considers how to prevent the acquisition of a right of light

Property owners and developers do not like the prospect of adjoining property owners acquiring rights against them which might inhibit future development of the formers’ land. Victorian estate developers invariably included terms in plot sales that prevented the new properties from acquiring light over adjacent land, or excluded any building scheme of covenants in estates below the highest class. Nowadays the main concern of developers and in particular landlords where residential blocks of flats are being built, is to ensure that freehold owners, or tenants do not acquire rights, particularly rights of light, against the adjacent land which may or may not be owned by the developer, or landlord. This is because of the need to ensure that on future development of that land, no adverse rights have been acquired against it by tenants. Rights of light present a particular difficulty because such rights can be acquired by tenants under s 3 of the Prescription Act 1832 (PA 1832),

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Freeths—Ruth Clare

Freeths—Ruth Clare

National real estate team bolstered by partner hire in Manchester

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Farrer & Co—Claire Gordon

Partner appointed head of family team

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

mfg Solicitors—Neil Harrison

Firm strengthens agriculture and rural affairs team with partner return

NEWS
Conveyancing lawyers have enjoyed a rapid win after campaigning against UK Finance’s decision to charge for access to the Mortgage Lenders’ Handbook
The Crown Prosecution Service (CPS) has launched a recruitment drive for talented early career and more senior barristers and solicitors
Regulators differed in the clarity and consistency of their post-Mazur advice and guidance, according to an interim report by the Legal Services Board (LSB)
The Solicitors Act 1974 may still underpin legal regulation, but its age is increasingly showing. Writing in NLJ this week, Victoria Morrison-Hughes of the Association of Costs Lawyers argues that the Act is ‘out of step with modern consumer law’ and actively deters fairness
A Competition Appeal Tribunal (CAT) ruling has reopened debate on the availability of ‘user damages’ in competition claims. Writing in NLJ this week, Edward Nyman of Hausfeld explains how the CAT allowed Dr Liza Lovdahl Gormsen’s alternative damages case against Meta to proceed, rejecting arguments that such damages are barred in competition law
back-to-top-scroll