header-logo header-logo

IVF law change removes legal absurdity

29 May 2008
Issue: 7323 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Human rights
printer mail-detail

News

A legislation change which will legally allow a child to have two mothers and no father when parents undergo fertility treatment removes an “absurdity” in the present law, a family law expert claims.

Following a vote in the Commons, the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill will update previous legislation to remove the reference to a father.
Margaret Hatwood, an associate at Thomas Eggar, says: “Where two women are in a relationship and one has fertility treatment to conceive then the partner should be treated as the other ‘parent’ even when the couple are not in a civil partnership. In those cases no man can be treated as a father to avoid a child having three legal parents which would be an absurdity.”
She says it will be interesting to see whether once this Act is in force, it will give non-biological parent more rights.

“In Re G, heard on 26 July 2006 by the House of Lords, a residence dispute involving two lesbian mothers was ultimately resolved with the dispute being resolved in favour of the biological mother. Although a shared residence order was made it gave the biological mother more time with the children. The House of Lords gave priority to the biological mother’s claims even though the mother’s former partner was a psychological parent,” she says. “It would be fascinating to see if this case would be looked at differently when the new Act is in force.”

Issue: 7323 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Human rights
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Kingsley Napley—Claire Green

Firm announces appointment of chief legal officer

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Weightmans—Emma Eccles & Mark Woodall

Firm bolsters Manchester insurance practice with double partner appointment

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Gilson Gray—Linda Pope

Partner joins family law team inLondon

NEWS
The landmark Supreme Court’s decision in Johnson v FirstRand Bank Ltd—along with Rukhadze v Recovery Partners—redefine fiduciary duties in commercial fraud. Writing in NLJ this week, Mary Young of Kingsley Napley analyses the implications of the rulings
Barristers Ben Keith of 5 St Andrew’s Hill and Rhys Davies of Temple Garden Chambers use the arrest of Simon Leviev—the so-called Tinder Swindler—to explore the realities of Interpol red notices, in this week's NLJ
Mazur v Charles Russell Speechlys [2025] has upended assumptions about who may conduct litigation, warn Kevin Latham and Fraser Barnstaple of Kings Chambers in this week's NLJ. But is it as catastrophic as first feared?
Lord Sales has been appointed to become the Deputy President of the Supreme Court after Lord Hodge retires at the end of the year
Limited liability partnerships (LLPs) are reportedly in the firing line in Chancellor Rachel Reeves upcoming Autumn budget
back-to-top-scroll