header-logo header-logo

IVF law change removes legal absurdity

29 May 2008
Issue: 7323 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Human rights
printer mail-detail

News

A legislation change which will legally allow a child to have two mothers and no father when parents undergo fertility treatment removes an “absurdity” in the present law, a family law expert claims.

Following a vote in the Commons, the Human Fertilisation and Embryology Bill will update previous legislation to remove the reference to a father.
Margaret Hatwood, an associate at Thomas Eggar, says: “Where two women are in a relationship and one has fertility treatment to conceive then the partner should be treated as the other ‘parent’ even when the couple are not in a civil partnership. In those cases no man can be treated as a father to avoid a child having three legal parents which would be an absurdity.”
She says it will be interesting to see whether once this Act is in force, it will give non-biological parent more rights.

“In Re G, heard on 26 July 2006 by the House of Lords, a residence dispute involving two lesbian mothers was ultimately resolved with the dispute being resolved in favour of the biological mother. Although a shared residence order was made it gave the biological mother more time with the children. The House of Lords gave priority to the biological mother’s claims even though the mother’s former partner was a psychological parent,” she says. “It would be fascinating to see if this case would be looked at differently when the new Act is in force.”

Issue: 7323 / Categories: Legal News , Family , Human rights
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
Boris Johnson’s 2019 attempt to shut down Parliament remains a constitutional cautionary tale. The move, framed as a routine exercise of the royal prerogative, was in truth an extraordinary effort to sideline Parliament at the height of the Brexit crisis. Writing in NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC dissects how prorogation was wrongly assumed to be beyond judicial scrutiny, only for the Supreme Court to intervene unanimously
back-to-top-scroll