header-logo header-logo

Jackson & fixed costs: the final chapter revisited

04 April 2019 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 7835 / Categories: Opinion , Personal injury , Costs
printer mail-detail

Dominic Regan reports on the next steps for Sir Rupert Jackson’s fixed costs finale

At long last we have the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) consultation on fixed costs (‘Extending Fixed Recoverable Costs in Civil Cases: Implementing Sir Rupert Jackson’s proposals’, March 2019). It has taken the department longer to respond than it took Sir Rupert Jackson to investigate and write his comprehensive report. There are two elements of reform. The plan is to fix costs in every fast track claim worth up to £25,000. More radical is the extension of fixed costs to most current multi-track claims between £25,000 and £100,000. An enormous volume of work would be captured.

Various benefits are claimed for the changes. Litigants would have certainty as to their liability if they lose and their recovery if they win—the continuing great uncertainty as to proportionality since 2013 falls away. A formula to determine recoverable costs in fast track is to be found at pages 16 and 17 of the consultation, and for the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

CBI South-East Council—Mike Wilson

Blake Morgan managing partner appointed chair of CBI South-East Council

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Birketts—Phillippa O’Neill

Commercial dispute resolution team welcomes partner in Cambridge

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Charles Russell Speechlys—Matthew Griffin

Firm strengthens international funds capability with senior hire

NEWS
The proposed £11bn redress scheme following the Supreme Court’s motor finance rulings is analysed in this week’s NLJ by Fred Philpott of Gough Square Chambers
In this week's issue, Stephen Gold, NLJ columnist and former district judge, surveys another eclectic fortnight in procedure. With humour and humanity, he reminds readers that beneath the procedural dust, the law still changes lives
Generative AI isn’t the villain of the courtroom—it’s the misunderstanding of it that’s dangerous, argues Dr Alan Ma of Birmingham City University and the Birmingham Law Society in this week's NLJ
James Naylor of Naylor Solicitors dissects the government’s plan to outlaw upward-only rent review (UORR) clauses in new commercial leases under Schedule 31 of the English Devolution and Community Empowerment Bill, in this week's NLJ. The reform, he explains, marks a seismic shift in landlord-tenant power dynamics: rents will no longer rise inexorably, and tenants gain statutory caps and procedural rights
Writing in NLJ this week, James Harrison and Jenna Coad of Penningtons Manches Cooper chart the Privy Council’s demolition of the long-standing ‘shareholder rule’ in Jardine Strategic v Oasis Investments
back-to-top-scroll