header-logo header-logo

Jackson & fixed costs: the final chapter revisited

04 April 2019 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 7835 / Categories: Opinion , Personal injury , Costs
printer mail-detail

Dominic Regan reports on the next steps for Sir Rupert Jackson’s fixed costs finale

At long last we have the Ministry of Justice (MoJ) consultation on fixed costs (‘Extending Fixed Recoverable Costs in Civil Cases: Implementing Sir Rupert Jackson’s proposals’, March 2019). It has taken the department longer to respond than it took Sir Rupert Jackson to investigate and write his comprehensive report. There are two elements of reform. The plan is to fix costs in every fast track claim worth up to £25,000. More radical is the extension of fixed costs to most current multi-track claims between £25,000 and £100,000. An enormous volume of work would be captured.

Various benefits are claimed for the changes. Litigants would have certainty as to their liability if they lose and their recovery if they win—the continuing great uncertainty as to proportionality since 2013 falls away. A formula to determine recoverable costs in fast track is to be found at pages 16 and 17 of the consultation, and for the

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

Morr & Co—Dennis Phillips

International private client team appoints expert in Spanish law

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

NLJ Career Profile: Stefan Borson, McCarthy Denning

Stefan Borson, football finance expert head of sport at McCarthy Denning, discusses returning to the law digging into the stories behind the scenes

NEWS
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
back-to-top-scroll