header-logo header-logo

25 March 2010 / Julian Parker
Issue: 7410 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness
printer mail-detail

Jackson joins the IT crowd

Julian Parker believes e-disclosure has been placed on centre stage by Lord Justice Jackson

In 2006 a very IT literate barrister colleague who was working with computer forensics experts organised a talk from them to an assembly of judges. They were increasingly seeing cases involving potentially large amounts of technical and digital information. The barrister was concerned that too often the parties in court would “fudge” the issue of electronic data and what their clients would be able to produce for the court, variously asserting technical difficulties or the sheer unmanageable quantity or nature of their client’s data as excuses for not producing all or even any of it. The host and prime organiser—a certain Lord Justice Jackson.

It has been interesting to see over the subsequent years how he has taken this subject on and given it some direction in the wider context of civil litigation.

Uncertainty

To date the place of digital, or Electronically Stored Information (ESI) in the litigation process has been somewhat uncertain and has depended, in large

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

NLJ Career Profile: Nikki Bowker, Devonshires

Nikki Bowker, head of litigation and dispute resolution at Devonshires, on career resilience, diversity in law and channelling Elle Woods when the pressure is on

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Ellisons—Sarah Osborne

Leasehold enfranchisement specialist joins residential property team

DWF—Chris Air

DWF—Chris Air

Firm strengthens commercial team in Manchester with partner appointment

NEWS
The High Court’s refusal to recognise a prolific sperm donor as a child’s legal parent has highlighted the risks of informal conception arrangements, according to Liam Hurren, associate at Kingsley Napley, in NLJ this week
The Court of Appeal’s decision in Mazur may have settled questions around litigation supervision, but the profession should not simply ‘move on’, argues Jennifer Coupland, CEO of CILEX, in this week's NLJ
A simple phrase like ‘subject to references’ may not protect employers as much as they think. Writing in NLJ this week, Ian Smith, barrister and emeritus professor of employment law at UEA, analyses recent employment cases showing how conditional job offers can still create binding contracts

An engagement ring may symbolise romance, but the courts remain decidedly practical about who keeps it after a split, writes Mark Pawlowski, barrister and professor emeritus of property law at the University of Greenwich, in this week's NLJ

Medical reporting organisation fees have become ‘the final battleground’ in modern costs litigation, says Kris Kilsby, costs lawyer at Peak Costs and council member of the Association of Costs Lawyers, in this week's NLJ
back-to-top-scroll