header-logo header-logo

25 March 2010 / Julian Parker
Issue: 7410 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness
printer mail-detail

Jackson joins the IT crowd

Julian Parker believes e-disclosure has been placed on centre stage by Lord Justice Jackson

In 2006 a very IT literate barrister colleague who was working with computer forensics experts organised a talk from them to an assembly of judges. They were increasingly seeing cases involving potentially large amounts of technical and digital information. The barrister was concerned that too often the parties in court would “fudge” the issue of electronic data and what their clients would be able to produce for the court, variously asserting technical difficulties or the sheer unmanageable quantity or nature of their client’s data as excuses for not producing all or even any of it. The host and prime organiser—a certain Lord Justice Jackson.

It has been interesting to see over the subsequent years how he has taken this subject on and given it some direction in the wider context of civil litigation.

Uncertainty

To date the place of digital, or Electronically Stored Information (ESI) in the litigation process has been somewhat uncertain and has depended, in large

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Possession claims are entering a new digital era, with procedural traps awaiting practitioners who assume familiar rules still govern every step
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
An indemnity costs battle with a £20m gap could reopen an important question: what weight should an approved budget carry?
back-to-top-scroll