header-logo header-logo

25 March 2010 / Julian Parker
Issue: 7410 / Categories: Features , Expert Witness
printer mail-detail

Jackson joins the IT crowd

Julian Parker believes e-disclosure has been placed on centre stage by Lord Justice Jackson

In 2006 a very IT literate barrister colleague who was working with computer forensics experts organised a talk from them to an assembly of judges. They were increasingly seeing cases involving potentially large amounts of technical and digital information. The barrister was concerned that too often the parties in court would “fudge” the issue of electronic data and what their clients would be able to produce for the court, variously asserting technical difficulties or the sheer unmanageable quantity or nature of their client’s data as excuses for not producing all or even any of it. The host and prime organiser—a certain Lord Justice Jackson.

It has been interesting to see over the subsequent years how he has taken this subject on and given it some direction in the wider context of civil litigation.

Uncertainty

To date the place of digital, or Electronically Stored Information (ESI) in the litigation process has been somewhat uncertain and has depended, in large

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Jurit LLP—Caroline Williams

Private wealth and tax team welcomes cross-border specialist as consultant

HFW—Simon Petch

HFW—Simon Petch

Global shipping practice expands with experienced ship finance partner hire

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Freeths—Richard Lockhart

Infrastructure specialist joins as partner in Glasgow office

NEWS
Talk of a reserved ‘Welsh seat’ on the Supreme Court is misplaced. In NLJ this week, Professor Graham Zellick KC explains that the Constitutional Reform Act treats ‘England and Wales’ as one jurisdiction, with no statutory Welsh slot
The government’s plan to curb jury trials has sparked ‘jury furore’. Writing in NLJ this week, David Locke, partner at Hill Dickinson, says the rationale is ‘grossly inadequate’
A year after the $1.5bn Bybit heist, crypto fraud is booming—but so is recovery. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Holloway, founder and CEO of M2 Recovery, warns that scams hit at least $14bn in 2025, fuelled by ‘pig butchering’ cons and AI deepfakes
After Woodcock confirmed no general duty to warn, debate turns to the criminal law. Writing in NLJ this week, Charles Davey of The Barrister Group urges revival of misprision or a modern equivalent
Family courts are tightening control of expert evidence. Writing in NLJ this week, Dr Chris Pamplin says there is ‘no automatic right’ to call experts; attendance must be ‘necessary in the interests of justice’ under FPR Pt 25
back-to-top-scroll