header-logo header-logo

Jackson leaves gap

06 March 2013
Issue: 7551 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Law firms may be exposed to professional negligence claims

The Jackson reforms could leave law firms exposed to professional negligence claims, a legal expenses insurer has warned.

The new rules, due to take effect on 1 April, prohibit the recovery of after-the-event (ATE) premiums for policies purchased on or after that date, regardless of when the client entered into a retainer with their solicitor.

This could land clients with huge bills they can’t pay and leave solicitors facing negligence actions if the solicitor fails to secure ATE before the 1 April deadline.

According to Russell Smart, chief operating officer of Elite Insurance, there are thousands of conditional fee agreement (CFA) cases where ATE insurance has not yet been purchased either because the case is not insurable until investigations are complete or enquiries are still ongoing. This means that, where CFAs are entered into before 1 April, the client may neither be able to recover their ATE premium nor benefit from the 10% increase in damages and qualified one-way costs shifting.

Consequently, clients will either have to pursue their cases uninsured or face disproportionately high ATE premiums which will have to be paid back from their damages.

Smart said: “ATE insurers tried to engage with Lord Justice Jackson and the Ministry of Justice over the last three years but without success and therefore it does not come as a surprise that they have not thought through the ramifications.

“The rules should be amended to allow for recoverable ATE premiums based on the date the CFA was entered into.”

Issue: 7551 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
Is a suspect’s state of mind a ‘fact’ capable of triggering adverse inferences? Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Smith of Corker Binning examines how R v Leslie reshapes the debate
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
After the Southport murders and the misinformation that followed, contempt of court law has come under intense scrutiny. In this week's NLJ, Lawrence McNamara and Lauren Schaefer of the Law Commission unpack proposals aimed at restoring clarity without sacrificing fair trial rights
The latest Home Office figures confirm that stop and search remains both controversial and diminished. Writing in NLJ this week, Neil Parpworth of De Montfort University analyses data showing historically low use of s 1 PACE powers, with drugs searches dominating what remains
back-to-top-scroll