header-logo header-logo

Jackson: the shifting sands

05 April 2012 / Dominic Regan
Issue: 7509 / Categories: Opinion , Legal services , Costs
printer mail-detail

Dominic Regan hears the latest from Sir Rupert Jackson

From the outset, Lord Justice Jackson has insisted that his reform proposals were to be seen and applied as a single, coherent package. There should be no cherry-picking or even staggered implementation. It is blindingly clear that the key planks will be implemented. The days of recovering additional liabilities are numbered and the big bang is set to occur on 1 April 2013.

Last month, I attended two talks given in the City of London by Sir Rupert (CLAN Conference, 12 March and SCL Lecture, 26 March). I have picked up a number of signals, some more explicit than others, which practitioners concerned about the future might like to note.

Fixed fast-track costs

The most significant is that fixed fast-track costs may not be implemented next year. Lord Woolf recommended them in 1996. It never happened. The Jackson perspective is that fixed costs will solve many problems. They will impose proportionality upon

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll