header-logo header-logo

Jackson: six months on

28 October 2013 / Dominic Regan
Categories: Features , Costs , CPR , Jackson
printer mail-detail

Dominic Regan serves up a survival guide

Obey!

Orders, rules and directions are to be strictly adhered to. Applications for relief from sanctions are governed by a revised CPR 3.9 which, says Jackson LJ, "is intended to be a stricter test limiting the cases in which it will be appropriate for the court to grant relief from sanctions”. Early decisions from the High Court bench demonstrate how robust the new approach is.

In judicial training this year the bench was encouraged to get tough on default. Edwards-Stuart J  on May 22 gave a judgment in Venulum Property Investments Ltd v Space Architecture Ltd and others [2013] EWHC 1242 (TCC). An application was made for permission to extend time for service of particulars of claim. Due to an innocent and unfortunate misunderstanding it was erroneously thought that one could serve particulars 14 days after the claim form. Not so. The long-stop deadline is four months after the issue of the claim form (see

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

FOIL—Bridget Tatham

Forum of Insurance Lawyers elects president for 2026

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Gibson Dunn—Robbie Sinclair

Partner joinslabour and employment practice in London

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Muckle LLP—Ella Johnson

Real estate dispute resolution team welcomes newly qualified solicitor

NEWS
Cryptocurrency is reshaping financial remedy cases, warns Robert Webster of Maguire Family Law in NLJ this week. Digital assets—concealable, volatile and hard to trace—are fuelling suspicions of hidden wealth, yet Form E still lacks a section for crypto-disclosure
NLJ columnist Stephen Gold surveys a flurry of procedural reforms in his latest 'Civil way' column
Paper cyber-incident plans are useless once ransomware strikes, argues Jack Morris of Epiq in NLJ this week
In this week's NLJ, Robert Hargreaves and Lily Johnston of York St John University examine the Employment Rights Bill 2024–25, which abolishes the two-year qualifying period for unfair-dismissal claims
Writing in NLJ this week, Manvir Kaur Grewal of Corker Binning analyses the collapse of R v Óg Ó hAnnaidh, where a terrorism charge failed because prosecutors lacked statutory consent. The case, she argues, highlights how procedural safeguards—time limits, consent requirements and institutional checks—define lawful state power
back-to-top-scroll