header-logo header-logo

Jackson “undermined by MoJ”

02 April 2015
Issue: 7647 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has undermined the impact of Lord Justice Jackson’s report into civil litigation costs, a leading commentator claims.

Writing in NLJ, City Law School’s Professor Dominic Regan, who assisted Jackson LJ with the report, expresses dismay that the MoJ “failed to keep faith” when the report was supported by Lord Neuberger and the then Lord Chief Justice.

“The single most damaging reform, which has meant that the litigation process is now worse than before the 2013 changes, has been the outrageous hike in court fees,” he writes.

Regan further castigates the MoJ for refusing to amend the Damages Based Agreement Regulations despite “reasoned” suggestions from the judiciary. As for the fallout from the Mitchell case, this has been corrected to the point where “we are not that far removed from where we were pre-reform”—“blockbuster bundles, rambling witness statements and the like”.

Issue: 7647 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Carey Olsen—Kim Paiva

Group partner joins Guernsey banking and finance practice

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

Morgan Lewis—Kat Gibson

London labour and employment team announces partner hire

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Foot Anstey McKees—Chris Milligan & Michael Kelly

Double partner appointment marks Belfast expansion

NEWS
Pension sharing orders (PSOs) have quietly reached their 25th anniversary, yet remain stubbornly underused. Writing in NLJ this week, Joanna Newton of Stowe Family Law argues that this neglect risks long-term financial harm, particularly for women
A school ski trip, a confiscated phone and an unauthorised hotel-room entry culminated in a pupil’s permanent exclusion. In this week's issue of NLJ, Nicholas Dobson charts how the Court of Appeal upheld the decision despite acknowledged procedural flaws
Is a suspect’s state of mind a ‘fact’ capable of triggering adverse inferences? Writing in NLJ this week, Andrew Smith of Corker Binning examines how R v Leslie reshapes the debate
The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has not done enough to protect the future sustainability of the legal aid market, MPs have warned
Writing in NLJ this week, NLJ columnist Dominic Regan surveys a landscape marked by leapfrog appeals, costs skirmishes and notable retirements. With an appeal in Mazur due to be heard next month, Regan notes that uncertainties remain over who will intervene, and hopes for the involvement of the Lady Chief Justice and the Master of the Rolls in deciding the all-important outcome
back-to-top-scroll