header-logo header-logo

02 April 2015
Issue: 7647 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-detail

Jackson “undermined by MoJ”

The Ministry of Justice (MoJ) has undermined the impact of Lord Justice Jackson’s report into civil litigation costs, a leading commentator claims.

Writing in NLJ, City Law School’s Professor Dominic Regan, who assisted Jackson LJ with the report, expresses dismay that the MoJ “failed to keep faith” when the report was supported by Lord Neuberger and the then Lord Chief Justice.

“The single most damaging reform, which has meant that the litigation process is now worse than before the 2013 changes, has been the outrageous hike in court fees,” he writes.

Regan further castigates the MoJ for refusing to amend the Damages Based Agreement Regulations despite “reasoned” suggestions from the judiciary. As for the fallout from the Mitchell case, this has been corrected to the point where “we are not that far removed from where we were pre-reform”—“blockbuster bundles, rambling witness statements and the like”.

Issue: 7647 / Categories: Legal News
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Anthony Collins—William Hallett & Lorna Scully

Anthony Collins—William Hallett & Lorna Scully

Anthony Collins hires two talented legal directors

Switalskis—five appointments

Switalskis—five appointments

Firm expands national abuse compensation team

Mathys & Squire—nine promotions

Mathys & Squire—nine promotions

IP firm announces new partners and senior promotions across UK offices

NEWS
A High Court ruling has sent a jolt through the legal profession after a newly qualified solicitor used an internal AI tool to produce court correspondence containing a fabricated legal citation
A significant data privacy ruling has clarified what counts as valid consent under UK data protection law
Executors may be overlooking billions of pounds in estate assets hidden in forgotten investments and misplaced share certificates
Britain’s booming non-surgical cosmetics market is operating in what some critics describe as a regulatory ‘Wild West’
Family contact disputes are becoming an increasingly prominent feature of Court of Protection litigation
back-to-top-scroll