header-logo header-logo

22 January 2010 / Professor Dominic Regan
Issue: 7401 / Categories: Opinion , Costs
printer mail-detail

The Jackson verdict

As I ripped into the report it soon became clear that the man had pulled it off.

I will never forget Thursday 14 January 2010. The day began with a “lock-in” at the Court of Appeal but no liquor in sight. At 0930 a herd of anoraks were allowed the privilege of being shut in a room to read the final conclusions of Sir Rupert Jackson, a year after he had taken on the impossible task of restructuring our costs regime, which was a ghastly mess. As I ripped into the report it soon became clear that the man had pulled it off.

It is an inevitability of my work that I regularly read reports and judgments. What Jackson LJ has produced is lucid, reasoned and stunning. I read the final report until my eyes ached. It is traditional for those who author reports to invite comment. The Jackson masterstroke was to get out on the road and canvass opinions from all who attended.

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen—Liz Giles

Bell Yard Kysen appoints senior legal PR and ex-government communications adviser, Liz Giles

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott—Lee Edwards

Clarke Willmott boosts Southampton commercial property team with addition of partner Lee Edwards

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors—four promotions

Lime Solicitors announces four promotions

NEWS
The Attorney General, Ellie Reeves KC MP, and Solicitor General, Andy Slaughter KC MP, marked the 25th anniversary of Pro Bono Week by joining lawyers, charities, students and parliamentarians at events celebrating voluntary legal work
A polished legal defence may owe more to artificial intelligence than legal merit—and creditors risk paying the price in delay and expense
Witness evidence can be compromised by AI before a solicitor sees the draft, leaving safeguards focused on authorship incomplete
Should a conviction stand when a later ruling reveals that the law underpinning it was wrong? The answer exposes a clash between finality and justice
The Environment Agency can prosecute offences beyond environmental legislation where proceedings support its statutory functions, the Divisional Court has confirmed
back-to-top-scroll