header-logo header-logo

15 December 2014
Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-detail

James Barrett—Practico

james_barrett

Head of costs team at the Treasury joins Practico

Leading commercial costs consultancy Practico has welcomed James Barrett who joins as a managing associate from HM Government, where he was head of costs team for the Treasury Solicitor’s Department.

Practico has experienced increasing demand for costs support to leading law firms and in-house counsel in high value commercial cases since the implementation of the Jackson reforms. In his new role James will assist in the management and training of the team as well as leading key client relationships.  

James has 14 years’ experience as a costs lawyer and led a team of 21 in his previous role. He specialises in managing the costs in large, complex litigation, including advising the Serious Fraud Office in its case against the Tchenguiz brothers and the Department of Public Prosecutions in the landmark Purdy v DPP “right to die” appeal. In addition, he has experience of cost mediation and provides training on the Jackson reforms. James is well known in the profession both for his role in high profile cases—many of which have set important precedents in the developing area of costs law—and his continued involvement with the Association of Costs Lawyers where he is a council member.

James says: “Practico has an outstanding reputation for its strategic approach to costs management and budgeting advice to leading law firms and large companies and I was delighted to be given the opportunity to join the consultancy at such an important time in its development. This is the perfect setting for me to apply my experience of managing costs in large, multifaceted government litigation to complex cases.”

Andy Ellis, managing director of Practico says: “James joining Practico is a fantastic way to end what has been an extremely successful year for Practico. We have anticipated and reacted to the new costs landscape that was ushered in by the Jackson reforms and our business has benefited as a result. James adds both management and technical ability to our team and we very much look forward to working with him.”

Categories: Movers & Shakers
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

NLJ Career Profile: John McElroy, London Solicitors Litigation Association

From first-generation student to trailblazing president of the London Solicitors Litigation Association, John McElroy of Fieldfisher reflects on resilience, identity and the power of bringing your whole self to the law

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Clarke Willmott—Elaine Field

Planning and environment team expands with partner hire in Manchester

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Birketts—Barbara Hamilton-Bruce

Firm appoints chief operating officer to strengthen leadership team

NEWS
A landmark Supreme Court ruling has underscored the sweeping reach of UK sanctions. In NLJ this week, Brónagh Adams and Harriet Campbell of Penningtons Manches Cooper say the regime is a ‘blunt instrument’ requiring only a factual, not causal, link to restricted goods
Fraud claims are surging, with England and Wales increasingly the forum of choice for global disputes. Writing in NLJ this week, Jon Felce of Cooke, Young & Keidan reports claims have risen sharply, with fraud now a major share of litigation and costing billions worldwide
Litigators digesting Mazur are being urged to tighten oversight and compliance. In his latest 'Insider' column for NLJ this week, Professor Dominic Regan of City Law School provides a cut out and keep guide to the ruling’s core test: whether an unauthorised individual is ‘in truth acting on behalf of the authorised individual’
Conflicting county court rulings have left landlords uncertain over whether they can force entry after tenants refuse access. In this week's NLJ, Edward Blakeney and Ashpen Rajah of Falcon Chambers outline a split: some judges permit it under CPR 70.2A, others insist only Parliament can authorise such powers
A wave of scandals has reignited debate over misconduct in public office, criticised as unclear and inconsistently applied. Writing in NLJ this week, Alice Lepeuple of WilmerHale says the offence’s ‘vagueness, overbreadth & inconsistent deployment’ have undermined confidence
back-to-top-scroll