header-logo header-logo

JJB to pay fans over football shirt scam

17 January 2008
Issue: 7304 / Categories: Legal News , Regulatory , Competition
printer mail-detail

News

The legal battle between sports chain JJB Sports and Which? about overpriced football shirts has been settled out of court, with the retailer promising to return cash to consumers who were overcharged.

Fans who paid up to £39.99 for certain England and Manchester United football shirts during specific periods in 2000 or 2001 and joined the Which? case against JJB Sports will get £20 each. Those who bought affected shirts but didn’t join the case can claim £10.

JJB was part of a cartel of seven companies fined more than £16m in 2003 for fixing the price of the football shirts. Which? used its powers under the Enterprise Act 2002 to launch an action for damages.

Tom Morrison, an associate at Rollits, says JJB was always going to be in a weak position following the earlier finding of anti-competitive behaviour.
“In light of this, it seems that JJB has decided to settle rather than risking a dangerous test case with a potentially worse outcome which may set a precedent for the future.”

The Office of Fair Trading, he says, has indicated that it will now focus on high-profile competition law cases of economic significance and therefore wishes to reduce the pressure on the enforcement system by encouraging similar class actions in the future.

Issue: 7304 / Categories: Legal News , Regulatory , Competition
printer mail-details

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Quinn Emanuel Urquhart & Sullivan—Andrew Savage

Firm expands London disputes practice with senior partner hire

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Druces—Lisa Cardy

Senior associate promotion strengthens real estate offering

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Charles Russell Speechlys—Robert Lundie Smith

Leading patent litigator joins intellectual property team

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll