header-logo header-logo

A job for life?

17 February 2012 / Sarah Whitten
Issue: 7501 / Categories: Features , Child law , Family
printer mail-detail

Sarah Whitten endorses government proposals to encourage parental involvement

More needs to be done to provide divorced parents with legal rights and the final report of the independent Family Justice Review, published last November, contained proposals designed to address this pressing issue. The government’s response, published last week, accepts the majority of the review’s recommendations in full. Indeed, the response goes further by recommending that the law should be changed to include a legislative statement of the importance of children having an ongoing relationship with both parents after family separation, where that is safe, and in the child’s best interest.

The government has established a working group of ministers to develop proposals for legislative change, which will be brought forward for consultation later this year. This needs to be at the top of the government’s agenda—it is the responsibility of both parents to raise their children and the right of every child to have a relationship with both their parents. The proposed changes to the law will help to give every child that

If you are not a subscriber, subscribe now to read this content
If you are already a subscriber sign in
...or Register for two weeks' free access to subscriber content

MOVERS & SHAKERS

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Pillsbury—Lord Garnier KC

Appointment of former Solicitor General bolsters corporate investigations and white collar practice

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Hall & Wilcox—Nigel Clark

Firm strengthens international strategy with hire of global relations consultant

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Slater Heelis—Sylviane Kokouendo & Shazia Ashraf

Partner and associate join employment practice

NEWS
The government’s plan to introduce a Single Professional Services Supervisor could erode vital legal-sector expertise, warns Mark Evans, president of the Law Society of England and Wales, in NLJ this week
Writing in NLJ this week, Jonathan Fisher KC of Red Lion Chambers argues that the ‘failure to prevent’ model of corporate criminal responsibility—covering bribery, tax evasion, and fraud—should be embraced, not resisted
Professor Graham Zellick KC argues in NLJ this week that, despite Buckingham Palace’s statement stripping Andrew Mountbatten Windsor of his styles, titles and honours, he remains legally a duke
Writing in NLJ this week, Sophie Ashcroft and Miranda Joseph of Stevens & Bolton dissect the Privy Council’s landmark ruling in Jardine Strategic Ltd v Oasis Investments II Master Fund Ltd (No 2), which abolishes the long-standing 'shareholder rule'
In NLJ this week, Sailesh Mehta and Theo Burges of Red Lion Chambers examine the government’s first-ever 'Afghan leak' super-injunction—used to block reporting of data exposing Afghans who aided UK forces and over 100 British officials. Unlike celebrity privacy cases, this injunction centred on national security. Its use, the authors argue, signals the rise of a vast new body of national security law spanning civil, criminal, and media domains
back-to-top-scroll